2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3730-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of MFN to Extend the Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, according to the United Nations Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the 1990s began with some 900 treaties and ended with over 2,900 treaties. However, in most of the cases these treaties were used to invoke arbitration, the arbitral tribunals would very broadly interpret the provisions of such BITs, as they were never perfectly unequivocal (Sharmin, 2020). This caused states to realize the risks of the treaties they had entered into, and as a result, there was a significant drop in the number of new treaties entered (Carvalho et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, according to the United Nations Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the 1990s began with some 900 treaties and ended with over 2,900 treaties. However, in most of the cases these treaties were used to invoke arbitration, the arbitral tribunals would very broadly interpret the provisions of such BITs, as they were never perfectly unequivocal (Sharmin, 2020). This caused states to realize the risks of the treaties they had entered into, and as a result, there was a significant drop in the number of new treaties entered (Carvalho et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%