1985
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(85)90067-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of modern psychometric theory in psychiatric research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the descriptive fit values (Muth6n, 1989a), 0.002 and 0.001, for Baltimore and Durham-Piedmont, respectively, also indicate good model fit. The covariance structure of the symptom level data from the two sites was consistent with a single factor, as evidenced by a scree plot of eigenvalues (not shown; Cattell, 1965;Edelbrock, 1987;Gibbons, Clark, Cavanaugh, & Davis, 1985).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…and the descriptive fit values (Muth6n, 1989a), 0.002 and 0.001, for Baltimore and Durham-Piedmont, respectively, also indicate good model fit. The covariance structure of the symptom level data from the two sites was consistent with a single factor, as evidenced by a scree plot of eigenvalues (not shown; Cattell, 1965;Edelbrock, 1987;Gibbons, Clark, Cavanaugh, & Davis, 1985).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Principle axis factoring analysis generated a four-factor that accounted for 72% of the variance in psychosocial items. A factor loading greater than 0.35 was stated as loading threshold using the rule of maintaining factors with Eigen values greater than 1.0 (Gibbons, Clark, Cavanaugh, & Davis, 1985). Barlett Sphericity test was statistically significant, x2(595) =19502.704, p =.000, the variables were highly correlated to one another.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, item response theory (IRT) [Embretson and Reise, 2000;Hambleton and Swaminathan, 1985] analysis was emphasized, as it allows for more explicit, theory-based tests of these group differences. This framework was previously used by our group [Rush et al, 2006;Trivedi et al, 2004b] and by others [Bech et al, 1978[Bech et al, , 1981Gibbons et al, 1985;Evans et al, 2004] to study depression. The results of the IRT and CTT analyses are usually complementary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%