2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of modern reversed-phase peptide retention prediction algorithms to the Houghten and DeGraw dataset: Peptide helicity and its effect on prediction accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peptides with large positive prediction errors are predominantly amphipathic 22 ( Figure 1B−D); therefore, their retention prediction error (ΔACN = HI exp − HI SSRCalc NonHel ) is dominated by the helical component: ΔACN ≈ HI Hel . We selected 5141 sequences with ΔACN >3% acetonitrile (shown in red in Figure 1A) for further analysis.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptides with large positive prediction errors are predominantly amphipathic 22 ( Figure 1B−D); therefore, their retention prediction error (ΔACN = HI exp − HI SSRCalc NonHel ) is dominated by the helical component: ΔACN ≈ HI Hel . We selected 5141 sequences with ΔACN >3% acetonitrile (shown in red in Figure 1A) for further analysis.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, machine learning-based methods rely on peptide feature selection, which is usually performed manually upon personal knowledge. As numerous factors are involved in peptide separation, the lack of suitable representations of peptide features, such as secondary structure 19 , leads to prediction errors. For peptide MS/MS spectrum prediction, there have also been tools developed, including kinetic model-based methods such as MassAnalyzer 20 and MS-Simulator 21 , and machine learning-based methods like Pep-tideART 22 and MS 2 PIP 23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These peptides have standardized RTs spanning a wide gradient and can be used to normalize the RT of individual experiments . Although RTs can be predicted through computational modeling, these predictions have a somewhat limited accuracy . Instead, the reference RTs of the iRT peptides can be used to correct for variations in the RT of the other peptides detected in a single experiment or to align RTs across multiple experiments.…”
Section: Managing Lc‐ms Variability Through Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%