2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11540-011-9202-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) for Disease Resistance in a Practical Potato Breeding Programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…for cyst nematode and Potato virus Y (Ortega and Lopez-Vizcon 2012;Whitworth et al 2009). It also looks promising for tuber quality features (Li et al, 2013).…”
Section: Specific Breeding Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for cyst nematode and Potato virus Y (Ortega and Lopez-Vizcon 2012;Whitworth et al 2009). It also looks promising for tuber quality features (Li et al, 2013).…”
Section: Specific Breeding Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To implement MAS for PVY resistance in the Oregon Potato Breeding Program, the RYSC3 marker and the CAPS marker ADG2 were used and confirmed as tools to identify PVY-resistant clones (Ottoman et al 2009). Appacale (Spain), a public breeding company, used RYSC3 and STM0003 markers to select breeding clones resistant to PVY (Ortega and Lopez-Vizcon 2012). The SCAR markers RYSC3 and YES3-3 were used for application of MAS in a conventional potato breeding program in the University of Wisconsin, USA (Fulladolsa et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of the RYSC3 marker has been validated by many authors such as Dalla Rizza et al (2006), Sagredo et al (2009), Veramendi et al (2011), Ortega and Lopez-Vizcon (2012), and Lopez-Pardo et al (2013. In the evaluation of the 271 Solanum tuberosum subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These represent a 95% correlation between molecular and serological results. Both methods are usually applied as a tool for virus resistances evaluations; like Gebhardt et al (2006), Sagredo et al (2009), andOrtega andLopez-Vizcon (2012). The remaining 148 accessions showed no virus infection and no molecular marker amplification, task that might be explained by unknown PVY resistance sources, since that plant has been exposed to natural pest presence on the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%