Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for the Evaluation Cultural Websites: A Framework for Comparative Analysis

Kabassi, Κaterina

doi:10.3390/info12100407

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In general, the sensitivity analysis investigates the impact of weighting, the number of alternatives, and the measurement scale on the ranking stability and hence the method's robustness [24,25]. The importance of a criterion reflects its weight's magnitude on that criterion, while the criticality is the degree of ranking variation for a small shift in the criterion's weight.…”

Section: Normalization Technique Benefit Expensementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this sub-section, a sensitivity analysis is carried out to determine the most critical position-related criteria and to evaluate the robustness of the investigated MADM algorithms [24,25]. A sensitivity analysis can be performed for all the available methods, but in our case, only n = 3 MADM methods are compared: SAW, CODAS, and TOPL1, while m = 6 alternative vehicles are examined for a trajectory of k = 2000 epochs.…”

Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cooperative D-GNSS Aided with Multi Attribute Decision Making Module: A Rigorous Comparative Analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Satellite positioning lies within the very core of numerous Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and Future Internet applications. With the emergence of connected vehicles, the performance requirements of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are constantly pushed to their limits. To this end, cooperative positioning (CP) solutions have attracted attention in order to enhance the accuracy and reliability of low-cost GNSS receivers, especially in complex propagation environments. In this paper, the problem of efficient and robust CP employing low-cost GNSS receivers is investigated over critical ITS scenarios. By adopting a Cooperative-Differential GNSS (C-DGNSS) framework, the target’s vehicle receiver can obtain Position–Velocity–Time (PVT) corrections from a neighboring vehicle and update its own position in real-time. A ranking module based on multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) algorithms is proposed for the neighboring vehicle rating and optimal selection. The considered MADM techniques are simulated with various weightings, normalization techniques, and criteria associated with positioning accuracy and reliability. The obtained criteria values are experimental GNSS measurements from several low-cost receivers. A comparative and sensitivity analysis are provided by evaluating the MADM algorithms in terms of ranking performance and robustness. The positioning data time series and the numerical results are then presented, and comments are made. Scoring-based and distance-based MADM methods perform better, while L1 RMS, HDOP, and Hz std are the most critical criteria. The multi-purpose applicability of the proposed scheme, not only for land vehicles, is also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Normalization Technique Benefit Expensementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Cooperative D-GNSS Aided with Multi Attribute Decision Making Module: A Rigorous Comparative Analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The need to evaluate museum websites is an issue that has been highlighted by several researchers [1][2][3][4][5]. This evaluation is important because a museum achieves its goals through its online presence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The evaluation of a website is a task that takes into account several criteria. For this purpose, in the past different Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) theories have been applied for evaluating websites of different content [2][3][4][12][13][14]. Among these experiments are some that involve museums' website evaluation [2][3][4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For this purpose, in the past different Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) theories have been applied for evaluating websites of different content [2][3][4][12][13][14]. Among these experiments are some that involve museums' website evaluation [2][3][4]. In this paper we focus on museums' website evaluation and use as a case study the evaluation of natural museums' websites.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Checking Consistency and Comparing Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods in the Evaluation of Museums’ Websites

Kabassi

Bekatoros

Botonis

2022

Digital

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The need to evaluate museum websites is an issue that has been highlighted by several researchers. In this paper, we focus on museums’ website evaluation and use as a case study the evaluation of natural history museums’ websites. For this evaluation experiment, MCDM methods are combined and compared. The focus of this paper is twofold: (1) checking the consistency of AHP for calculating the weights of criteria and (2) comparing Fuzzy TOPSIS and Fuzzy VIKOR with each other and with a usability evaluation questionnaire.

show abstract

Supply chain performance: a novel integrated decision-making model

Zhong,

Cheng,

Gholami

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeKnowledge management (KM) significantly affects supply chain management (SCM) and its performance in today's highly competitive corporate climate. It is crucial to consider this relationship to achieve optimal supply chain performance (SCP). This study aims to assess this impact by defining and examining the multi-dimensional relationships between KM Process Elements (KMPEs) and SCP Evaluation Criteria (SCPEC) within a comprehensive theoretical framework.Design/methodology/approachIntegrating KMPEs and SCPEC becomes an uncertain decision-making problem due to data deficiency and the vagueness of decision-makers’ judgments. To address uncertainties, this study uses interval-valued neutrosophic (IVN) sets and proposes an IVN model consisting of SWARA, which is one of the effective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches, and house of quality (HOQ) methods. IVN-SWARA is used to weight the SCPEC while IVN-HOQ establishes relationships and prioritizes the KMPEs and SCPEC.FindingsThe results show that reliability is the most significant SCP evaluation criterion. Among the KMPEs, capitalization, sharing, and transfer exhibit stronger associations with the SCPEC compared to the other elements. Capitalization as one of the KMPEs was found to be the most critical one, and efficiency is the criterion most affected by all elements of the KM process.Originality/valueThis study uses innovative methodologies to evaluate the adoption of KM processes on SCP under uncertain environments and involving multi-decision-makers. The proposed integrated model demonstrates flexibility and practicality in combining KM and SCM, leading to improved SCP. Notably, this study presents the development of IVN-SWARA and the use of the integrated IVN-SWARA - IVN-HOQ decision tool, which are novel contributions to the existing literature.

show abstract

Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for the Evaluation Cultural Websites: A Framework for Comparative Analysis

Cited by 6 publications

References 44 publications

Cooperative D-GNSS Aided with Multi Attribute Decision Making Module: A Rigorous Comparative Analysis

Cooperative D-GNSS Aided with Multi Attribute Decision Making Module: A Rigorous Comparative Analysis

Checking Consistency and Comparing Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods in the Evaluation of Museums’ Websites

Supply chain performance: a novel integrated decision-making model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About