2017
DOI: 10.1111/bre.12233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of multi‐kinetic apatite fission track and (U‐Th)/He thermochronology to source rock thermal history: a case study from the Mackenzie Plain, NWT, Canada

Abstract: Shale of the Upper Cretaceous Slater River Formation extends across the Mackenzie Plain of the Canadian Northwest Territories and has potential as a regional source rock because of the high organic content and presence of both oil-and gas-prone kerogen. An understanding of the thermal history experienced by the shale is required to predict any potential petroleum systems. Our study integrates multi-kinetic apatite fission track (AFT) and apatite (U-Th)/He (AHe) thermochronometers from a basal bentonite unit to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These samples (MAC‐12,‐39,‐41) experienced very slow cooling or steady state conditions within 120–80°C throughout the Late Cretaceous followed by Paleocene–Early Eocene rapid cooling to below 50°C (Figure ). These two phases of rock exhumation in the Mackenzie Mountains correlate well with the burial histories of the Devonian (MAC‐44) and Upper Cretaceous (MAC‐45) strata collected in the Mackenzie Plain (Figure b), and the apatite fission track multi‐kinetic thermal models of Devonian (Issler et al., ) and Cretaceous strata (Powell, Schneider, & Issler, ) farther south. Our thermal history models of strata in the Mackenzie Plain suggest burial and heating up to ~140°C during Paleocene–Eocene time, which is coeval with cooling phase two documented in the Mackenzie Mountains (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…These samples (MAC‐12,‐39,‐41) experienced very slow cooling or steady state conditions within 120–80°C throughout the Late Cretaceous followed by Paleocene–Early Eocene rapid cooling to below 50°C (Figure ). These two phases of rock exhumation in the Mackenzie Mountains correlate well with the burial histories of the Devonian (MAC‐44) and Upper Cretaceous (MAC‐45) strata collected in the Mackenzie Plain (Figure b), and the apatite fission track multi‐kinetic thermal models of Devonian (Issler et al., ) and Cretaceous strata (Powell, Schneider, & Issler, ) farther south. Our thermal history models of strata in the Mackenzie Plain suggest burial and heating up to ~140°C during Paleocene–Eocene time, which is coeval with cooling phase two documented in the Mackenzie Mountains (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…() and Ketcham et al. (), respectively, to model AFT ages and c‐axis projected track length distributions (see Powell, Schneider, and Issler () and Schneider and Issler () for recent examples of this approach). The kinetic populations for the samples on Cumberland Peninsula are much younger and suggest greater resetting later in their respective histories when compared to the southwestern Baffin samples.…”
Section: Thermal History Modelling Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications for modelling are that multikinetic AFT behaviour narrows the possibilities of thermal-history solutions that satisfy the FT data for all grain-age populations from a single sample during simultaneous thermal-history modelling [43,47,16,45]. A single sample may contain between two to four resolvable kinetic populations ranging in thermal sensitivity from under 70 • C to over 200 • C [44], extending the temperature range of the modelled thermal histories beyond the canonical "100-110 • C" quoted in most AFT studies, which employ a mono-compositional scheme and assume a typical fluorapatite composition.…”
Section: Advances In Aft Methodsology and Data Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRS approach is described thoroughly in Willett [69], Harrison et al [71], McDannell [15], McDannell et al [8,16], and McDannell and Flowers [18]. The most current AFTINV modelling approaches are discussed in Powell et al [47,72], McDannell et al [16], and Schneider and Issler [45].…”
Section: Thermal-history Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%