2024
DOI: 10.3390/en17071628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Neural Networks on Carbon Emission Prediction: A Systematic Review and Comparison

Wentao Feng,
Tailong Chen,
Longsheng Li
et al.

Abstract: The greenhouse effect formed by the massive emission of carbon dioxide has caused serious harm to the Earth’s environment, in which the power sector constitutes one of the primary contributors to global greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing carbon emissions from electricity plays a pivotal role in minimizing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the ecological, economic, and social impacts of climate change, while carbon emission prediction provides a valuable point of reference for the formulation of policies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shen et al [ 37 ] used the difference-in-differences approach to empirically analyze the policy effects of the energy rights trading system, and applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate China’s military-civil fusion policies [ 38 ]. Feng et al [ 39 ] constructed a BP neural network-based model for predicting carbon emissions in the electricity sector; some scholars used the Delphi method and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assess the main factors and sub-factors of green finance [ 40 ]; analyzed the risks related to China’s green infrastructure financing and prioritized them [ 41 ], as well as evaluating the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and policy choices in China’s green finance investment decisions [ 42 ]. Currently, many evaluation methods have certain flaws, mainly reflected in the inevitable subjectivity and lower precision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shen et al [ 37 ] used the difference-in-differences approach to empirically analyze the policy effects of the energy rights trading system, and applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate China’s military-civil fusion policies [ 38 ]. Feng et al [ 39 ] constructed a BP neural network-based model for predicting carbon emissions in the electricity sector; some scholars used the Delphi method and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assess the main factors and sub-factors of green finance [ 40 ]; analyzed the risks related to China’s green infrastructure financing and prioritized them [ 41 ], as well as evaluating the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and policy choices in China’s green finance investment decisions [ 42 ]. Currently, many evaluation methods have certain flaws, mainly reflected in the inevitable subjectivity and lower precision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%