37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-3546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of non-toxic propellants for future launch vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the heat transfer performance of methane is higher compared to other hydrocarbon fuels as a result of its high thermal conductivity, speci¦c heat, and low viscosity. In general, methane shows, compared to other potential candidates, better overall performance from a system point of view [5], higher speci¦c impulse [6], no risks for human health, simple extractability from natural gases, and a density 6 times higher than hydrogen when stored in liquid state at typical tank pressures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the heat transfer performance of methane is higher compared to other hydrocarbon fuels as a result of its high thermal conductivity, speci¦c heat, and low viscosity. In general, methane shows, compared to other potential candidates, better overall performance from a system point of view [5], higher speci¦c impulse [6], no risks for human health, simple extractability from natural gases, and a density 6 times higher than hydrogen when stored in liquid state at typical tank pressures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In addition less soot deposition is observed for methane oxidation compared to kerosene. 3 Methane is easier to store in comparison to hydrogen because of its higher molecular weight and is therefore a better choice for in-space application with long durations. The higher density of methane compared to hydrogen allows for smaller fuel tanks (less structure mass) and yields less pumped volume over time for the turbo pumps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These candidates present several advantages like higher density, reduced handling e¨ort (reduced safety precautions), and easier storage (lower cooling e¨ort). Moreover, several precedent studies have highlighted speci¦c advantages of methane [1], namely, better cooling capabilities, a higher speci¦c impulse, and lower coking and sooting propensities (at both, the cooling channel and combustion chamber walls).…”
Section: Urjuhvv Lq 3ursxovlrq 3k\vlfv '2 Hxfdvv 2zqhg E\ Wkh Dxwkrmentioning
confidence: 99%