ICASSP '78. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1978.1170488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of novelty filter to segmentation of speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These unitized representations may both influence, and be influenced by, hippocampal patterns characterized by a yet stronger form of invariance, expressed in allocentric and conceptual representations (Buzsáki & Moser, 2013;O'Keefe & Dostrovsky, 1971;Pennatz, 2015;Quiroga, 2012). We stress that these two computational hypotheses are not mutually exclusive and that PER may harbor additional computational functions, such as novelty filtering (Haltsonen, Jalanko, Bry, & Kohonen, 1978). Returning to the "gating" function of the PER, both computational paradigms allow to hypothesize that unitized representations, stored as such in the PER and its closely connected structures, may be evoked and reinstated when sufficient bottom-up sensory evidence is presented through lowerlevel cortical areas to allow completion of the unitized pattern, which then acts as a prerequisite for further transmission into the hippocampal system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These unitized representations may both influence, and be influenced by, hippocampal patterns characterized by a yet stronger form of invariance, expressed in allocentric and conceptual representations (Buzsáki & Moser, 2013;O'Keefe & Dostrovsky, 1971;Pennatz, 2015;Quiroga, 2012). We stress that these two computational hypotheses are not mutually exclusive and that PER may harbor additional computational functions, such as novelty filtering (Haltsonen, Jalanko, Bry, & Kohonen, 1978). Returning to the "gating" function of the PER, both computational paradigms allow to hypothesize that unitized representations, stored as such in the PER and its closely connected structures, may be evoked and reinstated when sufficient bottom-up sensory evidence is presented through lowerlevel cortical areas to allow completion of the unitized pattern, which then acts as a prerequisite for further transmission into the hippocampal system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The pattern vectors were formed by concatenation of two 15-element spectra taken at a temporal interval of 30 ms. Such a concatenation was needed in an integrated system described elsewhere (2)(3)(4) Separate sdbspaces were defined for each of the nasals In n p/ but due to their poor mutual discrimination their recognition accuracies will be reported here as one group. The result, however, is better than if they were included in the same subspace.…”
Section: Tee Practical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its applicability to the recognition of phonemes from continuous speech has been demonstrated in a few previous works (2)(3)(4). In this paper, the subspace method is developed further to yield results of practical value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%