1993
DOI: 10.1680/icien.1993.25304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Numerical Models for Water Quality Studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the coastal water quality spatiotemporally along the east coast of Indian coastal waters using site-specific data and model configuration (Panda et al, 2006;Bharathi et al, 2017;Naik et al, 2020;Mohanty et al, 2021). Through numerical modeling and remote sensing, estimation is user-friendly and low-cost in evaluating any water quality (Fallconer, 1993;Kageyama and Nishida, 2000;Brando and Dekker, 2003;El-Din et al, 2013); still, the field data are essential to validate the model and correct of ground value to the remote data. In situIn-situ sampling and laboratory analysis are more accurate than modeling and remote sensing data, while the remote sensing data provide better spatiotemporal resolution than the data obtained from in situ samplings (Miller and McKee, 2004;Wu et al, 2014), and numerical modeling infers spatiotemporal and water column information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the coastal water quality spatiotemporally along the east coast of Indian coastal waters using site-specific data and model configuration (Panda et al, 2006;Bharathi et al, 2017;Naik et al, 2020;Mohanty et al, 2021). Through numerical modeling and remote sensing, estimation is user-friendly and low-cost in evaluating any water quality (Fallconer, 1993;Kageyama and Nishida, 2000;Brando and Dekker, 2003;El-Din et al, 2013); still, the field data are essential to validate the model and correct of ground value to the remote data. In situIn-situ sampling and laboratory analysis are more accurate than modeling and remote sensing data, while the remote sensing data provide better spatiotemporal resolution than the data obtained from in situ samplings (Miller and McKee, 2004;Wu et al, 2014), and numerical modeling infers spatiotemporal and water column information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, residence times are extremely difficult to measure in the field and estimates are usually obtained via mathematical modelling. In recent years there has been an increase in the use of sophisticated multi-dimensional models for solving the hydrodynamic and constituent transport equations which govern the flushing of pollution (Koutitas, 1988;Casulli and Cheng, 1992;Falconer, 1993;Wu and Tsanis, 1994;Li and Falconer, 1995;Rajar and Sirca, 1996;Fuentes et al, 1999). However, such models are time consuming to develop and may require high spatial resolution and small time-steps for stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%