2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00723-009-0111-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Optically Detected EPR to Study the Stability of Sterically Hindered Amine Radical Cations to Proton Transfer Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Invariant electron stoichiometry (n = 1, Table 1) at these scan rates also confirms the absence of any contributions of the ECE type, or else from any product-substrate autocatalytic reactions [27,36,53]. However, at v < 0.05 V s −1 , the apparent number of electrons for several silatranes tends to decrease (n → 0.5), which is indicative of a slow auto-protonation (k p ) of the neutral 1 by its CR, similar to what was observed for trialkylamines [24,[54][55][56] and for several parent germatranes [16,17]. Since silatranes are less basic (the issue of basicity of silatranes is more complex, because of the contributions from N and O centers [57]) than the parent Et 3 N and (HOCH 2 CH 2 ) 3 N [1,58,59], their protonation is slower, so this current depletion appears at slower scan rates.…”
Section: "Non-proper" Silatranes: Naphthylsilatran 1fsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Invariant electron stoichiometry (n = 1, Table 1) at these scan rates also confirms the absence of any contributions of the ECE type, or else from any product-substrate autocatalytic reactions [27,36,53]. However, at v < 0.05 V s −1 , the apparent number of electrons for several silatranes tends to decrease (n → 0.5), which is indicative of a slow auto-protonation (k p ) of the neutral 1 by its CR, similar to what was observed for trialkylamines [24,[54][55][56] and for several parent germatranes [16,17]. Since silatranes are less basic (the issue of basicity of silatranes is more complex, because of the contributions from N and O centers [57]) than the parent Et 3 N and (HOCH 2 CH 2 ) 3 N [1,58,59], their protonation is slower, so this current depletion appears at slower scan rates.…”
Section: "Non-proper" Silatranes: Naphthylsilatran 1fsupporting
confidence: 71%