1979
DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02262.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Optimization Theory to the Control of the Optical Fiber Drawing Process

Abstract: The optical fiber drawing process is examined and a feedback control loop identified. The incremental dynamic response of each loop component is determined, and the sensitivity of loop response to system parameters is examined. The control loop is optimized, based upon a mean square error criterion with constraints imposed for periodic disturbances. An expression is derived for the effectiveness of the control loop with respect to sources of system disturbance and found to correlate well with experimental resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, we define the perturbed state variables in (12b) as a combination of the numerical eigenfunctions. As derived in Section II, two of the manipulating inputs: the preform feedrate and the fiber draw speed are specified as boundary values in (2). To ease the controller design, we explicitly define the feedrate and draw speed as system inputs…”
Section: Galerkin's Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this, we define the perturbed state variables in (12b) as a combination of the numerical eigenfunctions. As derived in Section II, two of the manipulating inputs: the preform feedrate and the fiber draw speed are specified as boundary values in (2). To ease the controller design, we explicitly define the feedrate and draw speed as system inputs…”
Section: Galerkin's Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested a feedback control of drawing speed to reduce low-frequency diameter variations. Smithgall [2] experimentally obtained an empirical transfer function (that relates the fiber diameter to draw speed) by heating a preform (7 to 25 mm in diameter), drawn at a nominal speed of 1 m/s, and measured the fiber diameter using an interference fringe counting technique (with an accuracy of 0.25 at a rate of 1000 measurements per second). Due to physical limitations, measurements made at some point below the heat zone were modeled as a transport delay (40 to 100 ms) to characterize the fiber diameter responding to geometrical variations in the molten neck-down region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A . signal generated from the measured data after being processed is sent to the fiber feedback control system to further reduce the diameter variation [51].…”
Section: B Pressurized Applicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results indicate that the fiber dynamic response is much more sensitive to the draw speed, than to the preform feed in rate [23]. It is very convenient, therefore, to choose either the draw speed or the draw force as the control variable.…”
Section: Modal Control Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It i s reported that the system works well, even in the presence of large changes in the preform feed-in velocity. Smithgd [23] applied optimization theory, based on a mean square error criterion, to quantdy and control fiber diameter fluctuations resulting from random mechanical and thermal disturbances. In that work, the mechanical and thermal disturbances were modeled together as a bandlimited Gaussian noise process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%