2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-021-02072-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of phylogenomic tools to unravel anthozoan evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 287 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is now a wealth of sequence data available from cnidarians ( Alama-Bermejo and Holzer 2021 ; Quek and Huang 2022 ; Santander et al 2022 ), but we chose to limit our main comparisons of voltage-gated K + channels to eight species with high-quality genomes and transcriptomes because estimates of ancestral channel sets depend on having a relatively complete picture of the channel genes present in each species. The species we chose are listed along with a consensus phylogeny of Cnidaria in figure 2 and represent key evolutionary nodes that enable several important comparisons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now a wealth of sequence data available from cnidarians ( Alama-Bermejo and Holzer 2021 ; Quek and Huang 2022 ; Santander et al 2022 ), but we chose to limit our main comparisons of voltage-gated K + channels to eight species with high-quality genomes and transcriptomes because estimates of ancestral channel sets depend on having a relatively complete picture of the channel genes present in each species. The species we chose are listed along with a consensus phylogeny of Cnidaria in figure 2 and represent key evolutionary nodes that enable several important comparisons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, cryptic diversity that went undetected in previous molecular and morphological studies validates the usefulness of phylotranscriptomics for resolving the evolutionary relationships of octocorals, and more generally of diverse lineages of marine taxa, including at shallow phylogenetic scales as examined here. Although phylotranscriptomics can be a reliable (and in some cases cheaper) alternative to several emerging approaches based on genome sequence data (e.g., Herrera & Shank, 2016 ; Quattrini et al, 2017 ; see discussion in Cheon et al, 2020 ), it remains largely underutilized in anthozoans (reviewed in Quek & Huang, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAD‐seq is widely regarded as an effective method in molecular phylogenomics, and our study supports previous work showing its utility in resolving both deep and shallow phylogenetic relationships (Cariou et al, 2013; Hou et al, 2016; Eaton et al, 2017; Leaché & Oaks, 2017; Lecaudey et al, 2018; MacGuigan & Near, 2019; Du et al, 2020; Mu et al, 2020). One highly discussed shortcoming of RAD‐seq for deep phylogenetic resolution is that mutations in restriction sites within lineages under study lead to missing data, and the probability of mutation increases with time and evolutionary distance (Quek & Huang, 2021). Notably, the effects of missing data, or ADO, in RAD‐seq may be limited for relatively closely related taxa (e.g., with divergences up to ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%