IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare the detection performance of mNGS against that of conventional tests (CT) in patients suffering from infection after kidney transplantation.MethodsA total of 138 samples from 85 kidney transplant patients with acute or chronic infections were simultaneously analyzed using mNGS and CT from July 2021 to August 2023.ResultsCompared with CT, mNGS demonstrated a higher sensitivity (95.96% vs. 27.27%) but lower specificity (48.72% vs. 84.62%) in pathogen detection. Moreover, mNGS exhibited significant advantages in detecting mixed and rare infections. The pathogens commonly identified in kidney transplant patients were severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), followed by Pneumocystis jirovecii and Cytomegalovirus (CMV). mNGS guided the precise clinical diagnosis in 89.13% of cases and assisted in altering therapeutics from empirical antibiotic approaches to personalized plans in 56.10% of cases, including treatment escalation (40.65%), initiation (11.38%), drug adjustment (3.25%), and de-escalation (0.81%).DiscussionOur study demonstrated the superior detection performance of mNGS and its significant clinical value. This reflected the great potential of mNGS as a complementary clinical detection technology for kidney transplant patients.