2021
DOI: 10.37188/ope.20212911.2649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of principal component algorithm in spindle thermal error modeling of CNC machine tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jin et al [22] built a casting-molding-size prediction model by orthogonal experiments for the multi-process machining process of investment casting, based on which the error compensation control of heat treatment of investment casting was realized. Wei et al [23] built a PCR model of spindle thermal error to improve the prediction accuracy of the thermal-error compensation model for CNC machine tools, which improved the predictive compensation accuracy by 23.4%. By using rigid-body kinematics, Okafor et al [24] derived a machine-toolpath-error model for compensating machining errors in three-axis vertical machining centers.…”
Section: Error-compensation Methods For Workpiece Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jin et al [22] built a casting-molding-size prediction model by orthogonal experiments for the multi-process machining process of investment casting, based on which the error compensation control of heat treatment of investment casting was realized. Wei et al [23] built a PCR model of spindle thermal error to improve the prediction accuracy of the thermal-error compensation model for CNC machine tools, which improved the predictive compensation accuracy by 23.4%. By using rigid-body kinematics, Okafor et al [24] derived a machine-toolpath-error model for compensating machining errors in three-axis vertical machining centers.…”
Section: Error-compensation Methods For Workpiece Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite various proposed methods for measuring and compensating thermal errors, there are still some deficiencies and flaws. Current studies are mostly focused on compensating static thermal errors, with insufficient exploration of the dynamic thermal behavior demonstrated by machine tools during actual machining processes [16][17][18][19]. Moreover, existing thermal error prediction models and compensation algorithms have not yet fully adapted to complex machining conditions and environmental changes, and their adaptability and accuracy in real application scenarios still need to be improved [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%