1998
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.10.4.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of process models in assessment psychology: Potential assets and challenges.

Abstract: Keeping you up-to-date. All APA Fellows, Members, Associates, and Student Affiliates receive-as part of their annual dues-subscriptions to the American Psychologist and APA Monitor. High School Teacher and International Affiliates receive subscriptions to the APA Monitor, and they may subscribe to the American Psychologist at a significantly reduced rate. In addition, all Members and Student Affiliates are eligible for savings of up to 60% (plus a journal credit) on all other APA journals, as well as significa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of mixture models in particular, the criterion of coherence of grouplevel, and (Bayesian mediated) individual testing of empirical fit can be brought to bear on the issue of model selection (below). Data aggregation across participants nevertheless risks folding systematic individual differences into an amalgam that then emerges as unrepresentative of any of its constituents (Carter, Neufeld, & Benn, 1998;Neufeld & Gardner, 1990). An associated risk is the application of model predictions to an ''unreal computational creation''.…”
Section: Results and Model-examined Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of mixture models in particular, the criterion of coherence of grouplevel, and (Bayesian mediated) individual testing of empirical fit can be brought to bear on the issue of model selection (below). Data aggregation across participants nevertheless risks folding systematic individual differences into an amalgam that then emerges as unrepresentative of any of its constituents (Carter, Neufeld, & Benn, 1998;Neufeld & Gardner, 1990). An associated risk is the application of model predictions to an ''unreal computational creation''.…”
Section: Results and Model-examined Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Overall, the above developments show how symptom significance can be brokered to MRI-monitored neuro-(co)activation by overlaying onto MRI-signal analysis the estimated stochastic dynamical template of a symptom-significant cognitive function (Carter et al, 1998); potential symptom significance of the present function is taken up further in the Section 8.1.…”
Section: Extension To Parametrically Homogeneous Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such patterns may become aligned with a stringently specified model architecture and/or parameter values. Clinical significance, in turn, is endowed to the degree that titrated features (see above) can be identified with measured deviations in activation (Carter, Neufeld, & Benn, 1998).…”
Section: Overview Of Proposed Formal-modeling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, psychometric properties of measured response parameters, such as latencies, in principle can be introduced into formal process models. Psychometric measurement errors, or modelexogenous noise (described in Carter et al, 1998), stand to be integrated with cognitive-process completion latencies (technically, by convolving the posited distribution of measurement errors with that of encoding-process latencies, the latter portrayed in Figures 2 and 8 -10). Measurement errors thus are expressed in an expanded version of the theoretical base distribution of trialwise latencies (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Challenges To Valid Clinical Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%