IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2020
DOI: 10.1109/igarss39084.2020.9324293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Random Forest Classification to Detect the Pine Wilt Disease from High Resolution Spectral Images

Abstract: Pine Wilt Disease is one of the forest pests with high destructive potential, due to its random spreading and the fast evolution of the symptoms. The correct identification of infected trees is critical for the containment of the pest in affected areas. This paper exploits the capabilities of Random Forest classification algorithms designed to spot the infected trees based on remote sensing images. We use as input both multi-and hyperspectral imagery with high spatial resolution, acquired via remotely piloted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, YOLO v7-SE exhibited the best performance, achieving an F1 score of 0.9117, a recall rate of 0.8958, and detection accuracy of 0.9281. These results exceed the accuracy achieved using the RF (Random Forest) method (0.91) [4] and the average accuracy achieved using the SVM (Support Vector Machine) method (0.9036) [6]. Moreover, the F1 score (0.79) obtained from detection outcomes using the SCANet recognition network introduced by Qin et al [13] underscores the superior effectiveness of our research results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultimately, YOLO v7-SE exhibited the best performance, achieving an F1 score of 0.9117, a recall rate of 0.8958, and detection accuracy of 0.9281. These results exceed the accuracy achieved using the RF (Random Forest) method (0.91) [4] and the average accuracy achieved using the SVM (Support Vector Machine) method (0.9036) [6]. Moreover, the F1 score (0.79) obtained from detection outcomes using the SCANet recognition network introduced by Qin et al [13] underscores the superior effectiveness of our research results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Initial stages of remote sensing image recognition have relied on traditional machine learning algorithms to extract artificial design features from images and training models. The Random Forest classifier has been used to detect and classify symptomatic trees, achieving an accuracy higher than 0.91 on both high spatial resolution multispectral and hyperspectral images [4]. Integrating a multiscale segmentation algorithm with an object-oriented approach has optimized the feature space of segmentation results, enabling accurate and rapid identification and classification of symptomatic trees [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, needle or leaf samples were taken to identify the presence of nematodes [106,142,146], to quantify pigments under laboratory conditions [85,105], and to assess their water content and spectral properties [123,136]. Soil sampling was conducted to determine possible origins of nutritional deficiencies [109] and to measure the field capacity [147].…”
Section: Complementary Data: Fieldwork and Traditional Remote Sensing...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repetitive UAV surveys of the same area were designed to collect time series as a database for change analysis. Hence, the scientists analyzed spectral and structural changes over time to assess mechanical crown damage [97,98], fire damage based on pre-and postfire data [99][100][101], phenological differences [89], and different stages of stress-induced symptoms evident in the tree canopy [92,94,[102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112]. The primary period of FHM typically lay within the growing season.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation