Remote Sensing of Planet Earth 2012
DOI: 10.5772/32136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Remote Sensing for Tsunami Disaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, it is possible to obtain damage Table 2. Summary of statistical parameters for developed fragility curves (modified from Suppasri et al, 2012a). The parameters µ and σ are the mean and standard deviations of the normal distribution, while µ and σ are similar parameters in a standardized lognormal distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, it is possible to obtain damage Table 2. Summary of statistical parameters for developed fragility curves (modified from Suppasri et al, 2012a). The parameters µ and σ are the mean and standard deviations of the normal distribution, while µ and σ are similar parameters in a standardized lognormal distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Velocity, hydrodynamic force, inundation flow and inundation depth are some of the parameters used by previous research studies to express the tsunami fragility or fatality ratio. Tsunami fragility curves have been developed so far in response to the Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004 (Koshimura and Yanagisawa, 2007;Suppasri et al, 2011;Murao and Nakazato, 2010), the Samoan tsunami of 2009 (Gokon et al, 2011), the historic tsunami caused by the 1993 Hokkaido Nansei-oki earthquake in Okushiri, Japan (Koshimura and Kayaba, 2010;Suppasri et al, 2012a), and recently after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake (Suppasri et al, 2012b). However, architecture and engineering of these countries are of different characteristics from the ones applied in the southwestern Pacific coast.…”
Section: Developing Tsunami Fragility Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage levels are typically defined prior to a post-tsunami survey by engineering teams and describe the condition of the affected structure, from zero damage to complete failure, thus forming a damage scale. Such scale is then used in combination with tsunami flow depth measurements (Ruangrassamee et al 2006;Mas et al 2012;Suppasri et al 2012aSuppasri et al , 2013a or results from numerical simulations (Koshimura et al 2009;Suppasri et al 2011Suppasri et al , 2012b in order to classify the surveyed buildings according to their damage state and a corresponding IM. The first column of Table 1 presents the damage scale defined by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in Japan (MLIT) for the survey of the buildings affected by the Great East Japan tsunami that struck the country on March, 11, 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first column of Table 1 presents the damage scale defined by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in Japan (MLIT) for the survey of the buildings affected by the Great East Japan tsunami that struck the country on March, 11, 2011. Fragility functions are derived by applying regression analysis techniques to the classified observations, using damage state as response variable and the chosen IM (most commonly the tsunami flow depth-e.g., Suppasri et al 2013a, b; in some cases numerically estimated flow velocities, or analytically estimated hydrodynamic forces-e.g., Suppasri et al 2012b) as the explanatory variable. Typically, fragility functions are derived by using linear least squares regression, assuming that the response to be modeled follows a normal or lognormal distribution, and by grouping or re-regrouping the data into bins of tsunami intensity (e.g., Suppasri et al 2011Suppasri et al , 2012a Nevertheless, it was shown by Charvet et al (2013b) and Charvet et al (2014a, b) that considerable uncertainty was introduced in the damage predictions when such methods are used as a tool to analyze building damage data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami caused devastation in 11 countries, and the monetary damage was approximated around 10 billion US dollars with extensive infrastructure damage [2]. The 2010 Chilean tsunami and earthquake resulted in a few hundred causalities; 81,000 structures were destroyed and around 109,000 were severely damaged [3]. The 2011 Great East Japan tsunami caused property damage of around 300 billion US dollars, with more than 400,000 buildings reported to be damaged or destroyed [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%