2010
DOI: 10.1177/0021998310366062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Response Sensitivity in Composite Processing

Abstract: This article demonstrates the use of response sensitivities in numerical simulation of composite processing via four different application examples: real-time result validation, model calibration, reliability analysis, and optimization. The analyses are carried out with integrated simulation software with new response sensitivity capabilities. Notably, the response sensitivities are computed by the direct differentiation method. This is an efficient and accurate alternative to the finite difference approaches.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen that the E (activation energy) had the highest correlation coefficient (negative) and the magnitude was close to 1 ( r p = 0.964), indicating that E was strongly correlated (i.e., inversely proportional) with the CDOCE. This agrees with a similar observation obtained in [18] for the RTM process, where the effect of the variation in E on the maximum and minimum cure degree was found to be significant. The corresponding sensitivities are depicted as a pie chart in Figure 6.…”
Section: Casesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is seen that the E (activation energy) had the highest correlation coefficient (negative) and the magnitude was close to 1 ( r p = 0.964), indicating that E was strongly correlated (i.e., inversely proportional) with the CDOCE. This agrees with a similar observation obtained in [18] for the RTM process, where the effect of the variation in E on the maximum and minimum cure degree was found to be significant. The corresponding sensitivities are depicted as a pie chart in Figure 6.…”
Section: Casesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In general, the statistical characteristics are obtained from extensive data collection and data analysis. In the present study, the mean values of the RIPs were taken from the deterministic analysis and the standard deviations were estimated based on engineering intuition and common available data from the literature [18,30] . The first three RIPs (process parameters) are more controllable than the material properties, i.e., RIPs between 4 and 10 (Table 1), and hence, the COV s of the first three RIPs selected were lower than the COV s of the RIPs between 4 and 10.…”
Section: Description Of the Probabilistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analytical approaches to DDM sensitivity analysis for structural response under mechanical loads have been well developed (Kleiber et al 1997) and extended to material and geometric nonlinear formulations of frame-element response (Scott et al 2004;Conte et al 2004) as well as frame-element geometry and cross-section dimensions (Haukaas and Scott 2006;Scott and Filippou 2007). The DDM has also been applied to composites processing (Bebamzadeh et al 2010) and fire attack on structures (Guo and Jeffers 2014); however, its application to FSI has not been addressed. This is partly due to the complexity of the computation for the FSI response and the cumbersome nature of staggered computational approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that macrolevel residual stresses, self-equilibrated in a macro domain were considered repeatedly. In this connection, see the series of works by Banks-Sills et al (1997− 2006 also see references therein) and Bebamzadeh et al (2009Bebamzadeh et al ( , 2010), where the role of curing residual stresses in the fracture of composites is examined. Such residual stresses manifest themselves as an additional load on the cracked body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%