2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of cutting conditions for surface roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
128
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
128
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The mathematical model function will be obtained by using the second-order polynomial regression model in this study which will be used as the objective function in GSO. The necessary information to construct the response model are generally accumulated by the simulation works [11,12]. Figure 1 shows the RSM flowchart in this study.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical model function will be obtained by using the second-order polynomial regression model in this study which will be used as the objective function in GSO. The necessary information to construct the response model are generally accumulated by the simulation works [11,12]. Figure 1 shows the RSM flowchart in this study.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical model function will be obtained by using the second-order polynomial regression model in this study which will be used as the objective function in GSO. The necessary information to construct the response model was accumulated by the simulation analysis [12,13]. Figure 1 shows the RSM flowchart in this study.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High surface roughness values reduce the fatigue life [2]. Surface roughness is influenced by tool geometry, feed, cutting conditions and the irregularities of machining operations such as tool wear, chatter, tool deflections, cutting fluid, and work piece properties [3]. It would be costly and time consuming to acquire the knowledge of appropriate cutting parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%