2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/4037379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (Rusle) Model to Assess Soil Erosion in “Kalu Ganga” River Basin in Sri Lanka

Abstract: Soil erosion is one of the main forms of land degradation. Erosion contributes to loss of agricultural land productivity and ecological and esthetic values of natural environment, and it impairs the production of safe drinking water and hydroenergy production. Thus, assessment of soil erosion and identifying the lands more prone to erosion are vital for erosion management process. Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (Rusle) model supported by a GIS system was used to assess the spatial variability of erosion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two methods may be suitable for the Sri Lankan conditions since the constants used in these two equations have been developed under tropical, sub-tropical, and Sri Lankan conditions. Furthermore, studies carried out by Jayarathne et al (2010); Wijesundara et al (2018), and Panditharathne et al (2019) show that one mapping tool of R factor is the Kriging tool in ArcGIS TM and QGIS TM and the other method is Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) in ArcGIS TM and QGIS TM environment. However, with carrying out of cross-validation, it has been revealed that the IDW method has provided the least error for mapping rainfall variability and R factor over the Kriging method (Panditharathne et al, 2019).…”
Section: Derivation Of Rainfall Runoff Erosivity Factor (R)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These two methods may be suitable for the Sri Lankan conditions since the constants used in these two equations have been developed under tropical, sub-tropical, and Sri Lankan conditions. Furthermore, studies carried out by Jayarathne et al (2010); Wijesundara et al (2018), and Panditharathne et al (2019) show that one mapping tool of R factor is the Kriging tool in ArcGIS TM and QGIS TM and the other method is Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) in ArcGIS TM and QGIS TM environment. However, with carrying out of cross-validation, it has been revealed that the IDW method has provided the least error for mapping rainfall variability and R factor over the Kriging method (Panditharathne et al, 2019).…”
Section: Derivation Of Rainfall Runoff Erosivity Factor (R)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, K values of above ~85% of studies are more accurate while K values of Dissanayake et al (2019) and Wijesundara et al (2018) are the most accurate according to the explanation by Renard et al (1991). (Wijesekara and Samarakoon, 2001) From available literature of previous studies (Joshua, 1977) 02 (Senanayake et al, 2013) From available literature of previous studies (Bandara and Somasiri, 1991) (Zijister, 1989) 03 (Jayarathne et al, 2010) From available literature of previous studies 04 (Senanayake et al, 2020) From available literature of previous studies (Fayas et al, 2019) (Senanayake et al, 2013) (Wijesekara and Samarakoon, 2001) 05 (Dissanayake et al, 2019) Nomography is used to compute the values of K based on soil properties (Wischmeier and Smith, 1978) (Ganasri and Ramesh, 2016) (Mapa et al, 2010) 06 (Panditharathne et al, 2019) From available literature of previous studies (Jayarathne et al, 2010) (Wijesundara et al, 2018) (Fayas et al, 2019)…”
Section: Derivation Of Soil Erodibility Factor (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations