2008
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2008)134:3(273)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of SEBAL Model for Mapping Evapotranspiration and Estimating Surface Energy Fluxes in South-Central Nebraska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gowda et al [25] reported an average accuracy of 85%, while Trezza [26] found the error to range from 2.7% to 35%, with 18.2% being the average error. Singh et al [9] found that ETc estimated using SEBAL could be within 5% of measured ETc. However, he also observed that on certain advective days, SEBAL underestimated ET, pointing out one advective day, where estimated ETc was 28% lower than measured ETc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gowda et al [25] reported an average accuracy of 85%, while Trezza [26] found the error to range from 2.7% to 35%, with 18.2% being the average error. Singh et al [9] found that ETc estimated using SEBAL could be within 5% of measured ETc. However, he also observed that on certain advective days, SEBAL underestimated ET, pointing out one advective day, where estimated ETc was 28% lower than measured ETc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Singh et al [9] agree that the value of zo is not critical in the estimation of ET when using SEBAL. However, when the roughness parameter is used in the estimation of advection (as in SEBAL-A), its accuracy or lack thereof may be consequential.…”
Section: Surface Roughness and Effective Advectionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this case, the user should choose the locations of the anchor pixels in each image, but this does not always occur because people can make mistakes as a result of external factors such as psychological and physical states. Furthermore, the criteria for selecting anchor pixels can be changed depending on the user and thus the improper selection of these pixels might cause bias in the sensible heat flux calculation and the resulting ET [40]. The METRIC model that departs from the SEBAL model in its use of weather-based reference ET to establish energy balance conditions at a cold pixel attempts to overcome the disadvantage of user dependency through the automatic selection of anchor pixels [41].…”
Section: Sebal Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, the SEBAL model has been applied extensively over various regions to compare ET of various land uses and land use change in space and time to address water resource and irrigation challenges (e.g. Goodrich et al, 2000;Bastiaanssen and Chandrapala, 2003;Bastiaanssen et al, 1998aBastiaanssen et al, ,b, 2002Bastiaanssen et al, , 2005Immerzeel et al, 2008;Singh et al, 2008;Mohamed et al, 2011). However, to the authors' knowledge this study is the first example where remote sensing data was used to estimate the ET of IAPs in space and time.…”
Section: Discussion Et Of Iaps and Native Vegetation Using The Sebal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have assessed the accuracy of the SEBAL energy balance and ET estimates, with differences in ET estimates ranging between 1 and 11% (Bastiaanssen et al, 2002;Bastiaanssen and Bandara, 2001;Bastiaanssen and Chandrapala, 2003;Mohamed et al, 2004;Tasumi et al, 2005;Singh et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2009). Bastiaanssen et al (1998b; reviewed the accuracy of SEBAL under several climatic conditions at both field and catchment scale by validating data against field observations.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sebal-et Estimates With Ground Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%