2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism — PCR method for distinguishing cheese bacterial communities that inhibit Listeria monocytogenes

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the microbial communities of different cheeses where Listeria monocytogenes either grew or did not grow. For this purpose, (i) isolates from the most inhibitory cheese ecosystem were identified and their ability to produce anti-Listeria substances was determined, (ii) bacterial communities of cheeses with and without L. monocytogenes growth were compared using the Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism method. The study showed SSCP to be an effective tool for differentiati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naturally established cheese microflora were found to be more or less permissive for the growth of pathogenic or spoilage microorganisms [13,85,93,124]. The inhibitory activity was related to biodiversity and/or dynamics of the microflora because no antimicrobial activity was detected with pure cultures of the isolated strains.…”
Section: Barrier Effects Of Complex Cheese Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally established cheese microflora were found to be more or less permissive for the growth of pathogenic or spoilage microorganisms [13,85,93,124]. The inhibitory activity was related to biodiversity and/or dynamics of the microflora because no antimicrobial activity was detected with pure cultures of the isolated strains.…”
Section: Barrier Effects Of Complex Cheese Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-strand conformation polymorphism-PCR (SSCP-PCR) is another PCR-based method for microbial diversity investigation that has been applied to dairy products (Duthoit et al, 2003;Feurer et al, 2004a;Feurer et al, 2004b;Delbes and Montel, 2005;Duthoit et al, 2005;Callon et al, 2006;Delbes et al, 2007;Saubusse et al, 2007;Mounier et al, 2009). This technique is based on the sequence-dependent differential intra-molecular folding of single strand DNA, which alters the migration speed of the molecules under non-denaturing conditions.…”
Section: Pcr-based Methods For Microbial Diversity Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypervariable regions are flanked by conserved sequences, which can serve for amplification with "universal" primers (Baker et al, 2003). The variable V1 Bonetta et al, 2008), V3 Ercolini et al, 2001;Ogier et al, 2002;Duthoit et al, 2003;Ercolini et al, 2003;Mauriello et al, 2003;Andrighetto et al, 2004;Ercolini et al, 2004;Feurer et al, 2004a;Feurer et al, 2004b;Lafarge et al, 2004;Ogier et al, 2004;Duthoit et al, 2005;Flórez and Mayo, 2006;Delbes et al, 2007;El-Baradei et al, 2007;Parayre et al, 2007;Abriouel et al, 2008;Ercolini et al, 2008;Gala et al, 2008;Van Hoorde et al, 2008;Alegría et al, 2009;Casalta et al, 2009;Dolci et al, 2009;Giannino et al, 2009;Mounier et al, 2009;Serhan et al, 2009;Dolci et al, 2010;Fontana et al, 2010;Van Hoorde et al, 2010;Masoud et al, 2011), V2 (Duthoit et al, 2003;Delbes and Montel, 2005;Saubusse et al, 2007), V4-V5 , V1-V3 (Randazzo et al, 2002), V4-V8 (Randazzo et al, 2006), V5-V6 (Le Bourhis et al, 2005;Le Bourhis et al, 2007) and V6-V8 …”
Section: Amplification Targets For Microbial Diversity Evaluation Metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decades, lots of approaches have been introduced under culture independent molecular methods which are frequently used in the identification and characterization purposes of L. lactis such as Culture-Independent Polymerase Chain Reaction (Salbi et al, 2014;) 16S rDNA Sequencing (Aquilanti et al, 2007;Khemariya et al, 2013b), PCR-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PDGE) (Mrkonjić Fuka et al, 2010;Pogačić et al, 2010;Marui et al, 2015;), PCR-Temporal Temperature Gradient Electrophoresis (TTGE) (ElBaradei et al, 2008), Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism-PCR (SSCP-PCR) (Saubusse et al, 2007), Real Time PCR (qPCR) (Grattepanche et al, 2005;Ruggirello et al, 2014), Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) (Miks-Krajnik and Babuchowski, 2014), Amplified Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analysis (Partial ARDRA) (Delgado and Mayo, 2003), Length Heterogeneity PCR (LH-PCR) (Brusetti et al, 2006), Multilocus Sequence Analysis (MLSA) (Rademarker et al, 2007;Khemariya et al, 2012) (GTG) 5 -PCR Fingerprinting (Rademarker et al, 2007;Khemariya et al, 2014), PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) (Deveau et al, 2003;Khemariya et al, 2013b), Multiple Locus Minisatelite Typing (MLVA) (Que'ne'e et al, 2005), RAPD-PCR (Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA-PCR) (Samaržija et al, 2002), Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) (Campo et al, 2002), Repetitive Element Sequence based PCR (Rep-PCR) (Fernandez et al, 2010), Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) (Taibi et al, 2010), Nested PCR (Khemariya et al, 2013c), Multiplex PCR (Pu et al, 2002) and Sau-PCR (Corich et al, 2005).…”
Section: Enumeration Of L Lactismentioning
confidence: 99%