1994
DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90074-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Smeed's formula to assess development of traffic safety in Jordan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jacobs [18] repeated this analysis for a number of developed and developing countries using data between 1968 and 1975 and obtained values of 0.000204 and −0.84 for α and β respectively. Gharaybeh [13] applied Smeed's formula to assess the development of road safety in Jordan, relative to that of other middle-eastern and developing countries. In this paper, Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jacobs [18] repeated this analysis for a number of developed and developing countries using data between 1968 and 1975 and obtained values of 0.000204 and −0.84 for α and β respectively. Gharaybeh [13] applied Smeed's formula to assess the development of road safety in Jordan, relative to that of other middle-eastern and developing countries. In this paper, Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A macroscopic roadsafety model commonly used in the late 60s was proposed by Smeed [33] linking the number of fatalities with the number of vehicles and the population. Jacobs [18] repeated this analysis for a number of developed and developing countries using data between 1968 and 1975 while Gharaybeh [13] applied the same formula to assess the development of road safety in Jordan, relative to that of other middle-eastern and developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, despite Garber and Hoel (1988) proposing recommended ranges for what constitutes high severity index weighted values (i.e., 9-12 for crash-related death, 3-5 for injury, and 1 for property damage), ETAN is mostly applied subjectively. Gharaybeh (1994) applied ETAN's equation to assess the development of traffic safety in Jordan. He designated the weighted value of 9.5 for fatality, 3.5 for injury, and 1 for property damage in the severity index.…”
Section: Weighted Crash Severity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Equivalent Traffic Accident Number (ETAN), a linear equation, is the most common approach used in weighting the road traffic severity index presented in Equation (Agent and Deen 1974; Gharaybeh 1994). The equation consists of three parameters – total fatality, major and minor injuries, and property damage – with the weighting values distributed amongst them.…”
Section: Weighted Crash Severity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broughton [25] validated the empirical relationship between SE (Sameed's equation) and other developed models on the basis of SE to provide common methods for predicting fatality and accident totals. Gharaybeh [26] researched the development of traffic safety in Jordan over the last two decades, using Smeed's Formula. Navin et al [27] developed a road safety model that includes special cases of the Smeed's model.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%