2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of solar quiet day (Sq) current in determining mantle electrical-depth conductivity structure – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geomagnetic disturbances associated with storms and substorms are typically several hundreds of nano teslas on the surface, which can easily mask underlying Sq signals. Despite the small amplitude, studies on Sq have been important for understanding the ionospheric electrodynamics (Richmond 1979(Richmond , 1995b and its coupling to the magnetosphere and lower atmosphere (Wagner et al 1980;Richmond 1995b); for determining a base level for geomagnetic indices (Mayaud 1980;Love and Gannon 2009;Gjerloev 2012); for monitoring solar radiation activity (Svalgaard and Cliver 2007;Svalgaard 2016); and for estimating electrical conductivity within the Earth (Campbell and Schiffmacher 1988a;Campbell et al 1998;Okeke and Obiora 2016).…”
Section: Observational Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geomagnetic disturbances associated with storms and substorms are typically several hundreds of nano teslas on the surface, which can easily mask underlying Sq signals. Despite the small amplitude, studies on Sq have been important for understanding the ionospheric electrodynamics (Richmond 1979(Richmond , 1995b and its coupling to the magnetosphere and lower atmosphere (Wagner et al 1980;Richmond 1995b); for determining a base level for geomagnetic indices (Mayaud 1980;Love and Gannon 2009;Gjerloev 2012); for monitoring solar radiation activity (Svalgaard and Cliver 2007;Svalgaard 2016); and for estimating electrical conductivity within the Earth (Campbell and Schiffmacher 1988a;Campbell et al 1998;Okeke and Obiora 2016).…”
Section: Observational Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When solar activity is strong, the resulting geomagnetic disturbances are typically of several hundreds of nTs in magnitude at the ground surface, which can easily hide the normal DGVs. However, DGVs have small amplitude, studies of these variations are very significant for understanding the ionospheric electrodynamics [Richmond, 1979], and for estimating underground electrical conductivity [Campbell et al, 1998, Okeke andObiora, 2016]. The DGVs include signals not only related to ionospheric currents but also to underground currents induced in the Earth's interior [Yamazaki and Maute, 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%