1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03214.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of stable isotope methodology to study the pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and metabolism of nitrendipine after i.v. and p.o. administration.

Abstract: 1 The pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and metabolism of nitrendipine were studied in six healthy volunteers (three females, three males) using [13C4]-nitrendipine as a biological internal standard. In the first study the drug was administered simultaneously by the i.v.[13C4] and p.o. (solution) routes and in a second study two oral preparations (13C4-solution and commercial tablet) were administered, also simultaneously. 2 The mean terminal elimination half-life was 8.3 ± 3.2 h (range 3.4 to 16 h) with no d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since nitrendipine exhibits multicompartment kinetics, the estimated elimination half-life is dependent on the time interval after dosing from which the t½, is calculated. When a dose of 20 mg nitrendipine is administered, the assay sensitivity is therefore one of the major causes of the wide variation (3.7-19.9) in mean half-life that have been reported (Aronoff, 1984;Hangson et al, 1984;Kann et al, 1984;Krol et al, 1987a;Lettieri et al, 1987;Mikus et al, 1987;Raemsch & Sommer, 1984 (Lasseter et al, 1984;Raemsch & Sommer, 1984). Bioavailability of the tablet was 11.1 ± 4.5% indicating an extraction ratio of 89% if complete absorption is assumed.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since nitrendipine exhibits multicompartment kinetics, the estimated elimination half-life is dependent on the time interval after dosing from which the t½, is calculated. When a dose of 20 mg nitrendipine is administered, the assay sensitivity is therefore one of the major causes of the wide variation (3.7-19.9) in mean half-life that have been reported (Aronoff, 1984;Hangson et al, 1984;Kann et al, 1984;Krol et al, 1987a;Lettieri et al, 1987;Mikus et al, 1987;Raemsch & Sommer, 1984 (Lasseter et al, 1984;Raemsch & Sommer, 1984). Bioavailability of the tablet was 11.1 ± 4.5% indicating an extraction ratio of 89% if complete absorption is assumed.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…infusion. The rates of input were normalized to the relative bioavailability of the Osmet, assuming complete absorption for the tablet (Krol et al, 1987a;Mikus et al, 1987;Raemsch & Sommer, 1984 For the tablet, pronounced interindividual differences in the shape of the plasma concentration-time profiles were seen, with large intersubject variability in tmax (0.7-4.7 h) and in Cmax (3.3-27.8 ng ml-1). The plasma concentration-time profiles for the Osmet and for the intravenous infusion exhibited far less intersubject variability.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marked difference in AUC between enantiomers upon oral administration could theoretically be accounted for partially by differences in the extent of absorption from the intestinal lumen. However, since the absorption of the racemate is at least 80-90% (Krol et al, 1987;Mikus et al, 1987), a difference of only 25-50% could cause such a difference in absorption. In general, absorption from the g.i.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of this variability can be attributed to variable presystemic elimination of the drug since it is much less following intravenous administration, and the absorption from the g.i. tract is almost complete (Krol et al, 1987;Mikus et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published data on the pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, metabolism and pharmacological actions of nitrendipine have been based on total plasma drug concentrations not taking account of stereoisomeric composition (Ankermann et al, 1989;Aronoff & Sloan, 1985;Dylewicz et al, 1987;Kann et al, 1984;Kendall et al, 1987;Krol et al, 1987;Lasseter et al, 1984; Lettieri et al, 1987;Mikus et al, 1987;Raemsch et al, 1986;Raemsch & Sommer, 1984;Soons et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%