Application of States and Transitions Graph for Developing the Model of the Process of Shelling a Mobile Armored Target

Volochiy, Bohdan

doi:10.1109/tcset55632.2022.9766916

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, as a result of the reconciliation of state vectors, transitions between states, and transition intensity values, it is possible to conclude that there are no both conceptual and local errors. A detailed description of the algorithm for processing the obtained data represents a significant amount of data and will be presented in the next work, which will be the completion of the research that we reported in works [41,43] and in this paper. Thus, in [41], the general concepts of basic events and features of constructing a graph of states and transitions for modeling the firing process are given.…”

Section: Validation Of the Proposed Discrete-continuous Stochastic Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this work, the limits of the permissible possibilities of artifacts of the stochastic model have logical delineations. Namely, in the case of insufficient efficiency of subsystems [43], we predictably have a decrease in the overall probability of damage to vulnerable compartments of a single target in armor protection, which corresponds to the fulfillment of the PAG fire task.…”

Section: Verification Of the Structural-automatic Model Of Shellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, after the blast of the first FBP, the probability of completing the task of the PAG on a single target in armor defense was 088, after the second shot -0.95, and in a series of three shots -0.98. Consequently, the total degree of damage caused by "usable fragments" to vulnerable compartments of a single target in armor protection in a series of three FBP shots corresponds to the failure of the fire task by a promising automatic gun [43]. We focus on the reproduction of a statistical picture of the behavior of the process of firing a movable armored target with fragmentation-beam projectiles of directional action.…”

Section: Verification Of the Structural-automatic Model Of Shellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Determining the components of the structural-automatic model of firing a single target in armor protection with fragmentation-beam projectiles of directed action in a series of three shots based on the reference graph of states

Yakovenko

Фурманова

Flys

et al. 2022

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The problem of determining the components of the structural-automatic model is solved by creating a graph of states and transitions. The purpose of the process is to form a formalized expression of the object of study in the form of a structural-machine model of the process of firing a mobile armored vehicle with a series of three shots with fragmentation-beam projectiles of directional action. This model can be further practically implemented during the development of the latest samples of fire resistance in order to reduce errors at the stage of system design. This approach reduces the cost of design and production of prototypes by up to 25 %. This paper considers the process involving interrelated elements of the components of a system while accounting for all possible variants of its behavior from the moment of detection to the failure of a single target in armor protection to perform tasks as intended. The execution of a fire task is considered as a set of certain procedures characterized by the average value of their duration. The explosive destruction of the hull of each fragmentation-beam projectile is characterized by the self-propagation of the reaction of explosive transformations based on tabular data on an armored combat vehicle. Appropriate procedures (phases) of firing a single target in armor protection are advisable to formalize to create preconditions for obtaining the value of a statistical indicator of the effectiveness of causing damage to the target and to study further alternative options for this process. For the proposed structural-automatic model of the process of firing a single target in armor protection with a series of fragmentation-beam projectiles of directional action, validation and verification were carried out, which demonstrated the convergence of the results that exceeded 60 %. The use of the structural-automatic model's components proposed in this work increases the probability of performing a fire task for the first shot from 0.23 to 0.88, for the second – from 0.35 to 0.95, for the third – from 0.45 to 0.98

show abstract

Section: Validation Of the Proposed Discrete-continuous Stochastic Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Verification Of the Structural-automatic Model Of Shellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Verification Of the Structural-automatic Model Of Shellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determining the components of the structural-automatic model of firing a single target in armor protection with fragmentation-beam projectiles of directed action in a series of three shots based on the reference graph of states

Yakovenko

Фурманова

Flys

et al. 2022

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Application of States and Transitions Graph for Developing the Model of the Process of Shelling a Mobile Armored Target

Cited by 1 publication

References 8 publications

Determining the components of the structural-automatic model of firing a single target in armor protection with fragmentation-beam projectiles of directed action in a series of three shots based on the reference graph of states

Determining the components of the structural-automatic model of firing a single target in armor protection with fragmentation-beam projectiles of directed action in a series of three shots based on the reference graph of states

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About