1998
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.70.175
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of superconducting quantum interference devices to nuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) provides information in low polarizing fields that is hard to obtain in high fields. A new generation of sensitive NMR detectors, the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), provides a fresh approach to low-field NMR studies. The SQUID is an ideal detector for low-field NMR, since its response does not depend on signal frequency as is the case of conventional NMR spectrometers. This review describes the experimental and theoretical studies in which SQUIDs have been… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
(238 reference statements)
0
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach, the sample is pre-polarized by a relatively strong (up to 100 mT and higher) magnetic field prior to each imaging step. The second problem can be solved if highly sensitive SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device) sensors [31] are used to measure NMR signals [32][33][34][35]. SQUIDs with untuned input circuits are typically employed [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], because their response is independent of frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the sample is pre-polarized by a relatively strong (up to 100 mT and higher) magnetic field prior to each imaging step. The second problem can be solved if highly sensitive SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device) sensors [31] are used to measure NMR signals [32][33][34][35]. SQUIDs with untuned input circuits are typically employed [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], because their response is independent of frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…¿ÕË ÒÓÇAEÔÍÂÊÂÐËâ ÃÎËÊÍË Í ÑÔÖÜÇÔÕÄÎÇÐËá. £ ÔÄâÊË Ô àÕËÏ ÑÔÕÂÐÑÄËÏÔâ РÔÓÂÄÐÇÐËË ÚÖÄÔÕÄË-ÕÇÎßÐÑÔÕË ÂÒÒÂÓÂÕÖÓÞ, ÑÔÐÑÄÂÐÐÑÌ Ð ÕÓÈØ ÐÂËÃÑÎÇÇ ÖÐËÄÇÓÔÂÎßÐÞØ ÏÇÕÑAEÂØ ÓÇÅËÔÕÓÂÙËË ÏÂÅÐËÕÐÑÅÑ ÓÇÊÑ-ÐÂÐÔÂ: ËÐAEÖÍÙËÑÐÐÑÏ [11,14], ³¬£ª¥ [117] Ë ®²³® [194].°ÃÜÇÇ ÄÞÓÂÉÇÐËÇ AEÎâ ÑÕÐÑÛÇÐËâ ÔËÅÐÂÎÂ Í ÛÖÏÖ AEÎâ N s ÔÒËÐÑÄ I Ô ÅËÓÑÏÂÅÐËÕÐÞÏ ÑÕÐÑÛÇÐËÇÏ g Ä ÒÑÎÇ H Ä àÕËØ ÏÇÕÑAEÂØ ËÏÇÇÕ ÄËAE [197].…”
Section: ±óçAeþôõñóëâ ñõíóþõëçunclassified
“…∆f in a pulsed NMR experiment is inversely proportional to T 2 and has already been included in Eqn. (7) and (10). m 0 = M 0 V d is the net magnetic moment of the spins inside the coil volume, which is transported without loss from the encoding to the detection location in an ideal remote experiment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DC magnetometers such as superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) [10] or optical magnetometers [11] may be preferred at low fields. Alternatively, spin-exchange optical detection could serve as a technique that is specific to measure the polarization of noble gas sensor media.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%