2018
DOI: 10.1190/tle37030200.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of supergrouping to enhance 3D prestack seismic data from a desert environment

Abstract: Fit-for-purpose enhancement remains a critical task for processing land seismic data, especially with the increasing popularity of high-channel-count and single-sensor data. We describe here a flexible scheme called smart supergrouping that performs summation of traces from neighboring shots and receivers. Supergrouping enhances desired reflection signals while suppressing ground roll and other noise. It also delivers prestack data of significantly high quality, critical for deriving velocities, deconvolution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bakulin et al proposed a wavefront method for interpreting seismic refraction waves, i.e., using Huygens' principle to reconstruct the wavefront field based on the recorded first-to-wave travel time at two gun sites, and then calculate the depth of the refraction layer based on the velocity above the refraction layer, but when the stratigraphy changes drastically, the circular wavefront theory does not match the actual situation and cannot be applied to this geological condition [9]. Shiraishi et al proposed the delay time method to identify the refraction layer by calculating the relationship between the reciprocal time and the intercept time, but this method is limited in the imaging effect in subsurface formations with large dip angles and multiple media layers [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bakulin et al proposed a wavefront method for interpreting seismic refraction waves, i.e., using Huygens' principle to reconstruct the wavefront field based on the recorded first-to-wave travel time at two gun sites, and then calculate the depth of the refraction layer based on the velocity above the refraction layer, but when the stratigraphy changes drastically, the circular wavefront theory does not match the actual situation and cannot be applied to this geological condition [9]. Shiraishi et al proposed the delay time method to identify the refraction layer by calculating the relationship between the reciprocal time and the intercept time, but this method is limited in the imaging effect in subsurface formations with large dip angles and multiple media layers [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We apply two different enhancement approaches in the cross-spread domain and use the same stacking aperture. Supergrouping performs summation along global NMO surfaces (Bakulin et al, 2018) and naturally gives a more hyperbolic appearance (Figure 8b). In contrast, nonlinear beamforming estimates local summation surfaces from the data itself (Bakulin et al, 2017) and gives a less hyperbolic appearance (Figure 8c) that could be expected if some statics and waveform variations are still to be corrected for during early processing stages.…”
Section: Real Data Example Of 3d Data Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%