2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.07.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of surfactant assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction as an efficient sample treatment technique for preconcentration and trace detection of zonisamide and carbamazepine in urine and plasma samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Preconcentration is a very important issue for achievement of low detection limits (Behbahani et al 2014i, j;Salarian et al 2014;Ebrahimzadeh and Behbahani 2013). Several procedures have been developed for these purposes such as liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) (Silvestre et al 2009), liquid phase microextraction (LPME) (Behbahani et al 2013bHossienpoor-Zaryabi et al 2014;Naeemullah et al 2013Naeemullah et al , 2014Unsal et al 2014) co-precipitation (Saracoglu et al 2003;Doner and Ege 2005), and solid phase extraction (SPE) (Bagheri et al 2012a, b;Nabid et al 2012Nabid et al , 2014Ghorbani-Kalhor et al 2014;Behbahani et al 2015;Omidi et al 2014a, b). However, some of these pretreatment methods need large amounts of sample and/or organic solvents, are time-consuming and expensive, and have unsatisfactory enrichment factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Preconcentration is a very important issue for achievement of low detection limits (Behbahani et al 2014i, j;Salarian et al 2014;Ebrahimzadeh and Behbahani 2013). Several procedures have been developed for these purposes such as liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) (Silvestre et al 2009), liquid phase microextraction (LPME) (Behbahani et al 2013bHossienpoor-Zaryabi et al 2014;Naeemullah et al 2013Naeemullah et al , 2014Unsal et al 2014) co-precipitation (Saracoglu et al 2003;Doner and Ege 2005), and solid phase extraction (SPE) (Bagheri et al 2012a, b;Nabid et al 2012Nabid et al , 2014Ghorbani-Kalhor et al 2014;Behbahani et al 2015;Omidi et al 2014a, b). However, some of these pretreatment methods need large amounts of sample and/or organic solvents, are time-consuming and expensive, and have unsatisfactory enrichment factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A cloudy solution is formed [33] and the analytes in the sample is extracted into the fine droplets of extraction solvent, sedimented at the bottom of the conical test tube after centrifugation. The amount of analytes in the sedimented phase can be determined by instrumental analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of chromatographic methods for pharmaceutical analysis in comparison to other analytical methods has several advantages including high versatility, selectivity and efficiency, in addition to its ability to be coupled with different sample extraction techniques [3033]. Micellar liquid chromatography (MLC) is advantageous over conventional liquid chromatography due to several reasons including the smaller concentration of organic solvent in the mobile phase which render it cheaper and less toxic, the improved selectivity and ability to separate different hydrophobic and hydrophilic analytes due to variable mechanisms of interaction between analytes and the mobile and stationary phases, the excellent solubilizing power of micelles and the ability to use direct injection of complex sample matrices including biological fluids without pretreatment procedures [34–36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%