2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13111548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of SWAT in Hydrological Simulation of Complex Mountainous River Basin (Part II: Climate Change Impact Assessment)

Abstract: This study aims at analysing the impact of climate change (CC) on the river hydrology of a complex mountainous river basin—the Budhigandaki River Basin (BRB)—using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model that was calibrated and validated in Part I of this research. A relatively new approach of selecting global climate models (GCMs) for each of the two selected RCPs, 4.5 (stabilization scenario) and 8.5 (high emission scenario), representing four extreme cases (warm-wet, cold-wet, warm-dry,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger values of PBIAS (.30%) using PERSIANN-CDR and MERRA2 also result in unsatisfactory performance. The differences in the simulated and observed flows can be attributed to many factors: (i) errors in precipitation estimations, (ii) higher spatial variability in the precipitation due to orographic effects, (iii) errors in stream gauge observations and (iv) possible errors in model structure or combinations of the above (Manfreda et al 2020;Marahatta et al 2021). These results indicate that satellite precipitation products are suitable for hydrological simulations at a monthly scale in a complex topographic region.…”
Section: Comparison At a Monthly Scalementioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Larger values of PBIAS (.30%) using PERSIANN-CDR and MERRA2 also result in unsatisfactory performance. The differences in the simulated and observed flows can be attributed to many factors: (i) errors in precipitation estimations, (ii) higher spatial variability in the precipitation due to orographic effects, (iii) errors in stream gauge observations and (iv) possible errors in model structure or combinations of the above (Manfreda et al 2020;Marahatta et al 2021). These results indicate that satellite precipitation products are suitable for hydrological simulations at a monthly scale in a complex topographic region.…”
Section: Comparison At a Monthly Scalementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) and Hydrologic Engineering Center-Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) are semi-distributed models, and Visualizing Ecosystem Land Management Assessments (VELMA) and Variant of Système Hydrologique Européen (MIKE SHE) are fully distributed models (Devkota & Gyawali 2015;Sitterrson et al 2017;Pandey et al 2020). These are either continuous or event-based flow generating models (Hossain Hewa & Wella-Hewage 2019;Marahatta et al 2021). The SWAT model was selected as the most popular model from a list of 73 hydrological models (Mannschatz et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite abundant recent studies on future hydro‐climatic projections due to CC (e.g., Bhattarai et al, 2022; Dhaubanjar et al, 2019; Marahatta et al, 2021), their impacts on flood inundation at the watershed scale are still limited in Nepal. Consequently, very few studies (Dewan, 2015) have quantified the flood impacts on the socio‐economic sectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various methods available for bias correction, Quantile Mapping (QM) is considered as a relatively better technique for improving the performance of climate models (Tegegne et al, 2017). Studies like Dhaubanjar et al (2019) and Marahatta et al (2021) have applied this technique in CC studies in different basins of Nepal. However, climate projections are approximations which vary considerably with location and physiographic regions, thus, warranting careful interpretation of their results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars belonging to different geophysical domains have studied the consequences of climate change. For example, here are some reviews of relevant research in recent times (17)(18)(19)(20)(21) . However, none of these research works represented a study on seasonal water availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%