2016
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2016.83033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of SWAT Model to the Olifants Basin: Calibration, Validation and Uncertainty Analysis

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial distribution of sediment yield was done in ArcGIS 10.2 environment. Figure 4 shows simulated and observed streamflow for both calibration and validation periods [19]. Sediment was also satisfactorily modeled with simulated sediment matching fairly with the observed (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Spatial distribution of sediment yield was done in ArcGIS 10.2 environment. Figure 4 shows simulated and observed streamflow for both calibration and validation periods [19]. Sediment was also satisfactorily modeled with simulated sediment matching fairly with the observed (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In recent years, distributed hydrological models have been widely used to evaluate the hydrological effects of climate and land use changes. In many distributed hydrological models, the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model has been widely used in the simulation of basin water balance, long-term surface runoff and daily average runoff (Gyamfi et al, 2016). A large number of domestic studies have adopted models to simulate the effects of climate and land-use changes on the hydrological cycle of a river basin; in particular, these models have provided a basis for large-scale complex basin applications (e.g., the Haihe River Basin (Zhang and Chen, 2009), Yellow River Basin (Wang and Zheng, 2014), and Huaihe River Basin (Yang and Chen, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first 8 years prior to 1988 were used as a warm up period to mitigate unknown initial conditions. Sensitive parameters to streamflow with their fitted values (Table 3) were adapted from Gyamfi et al [32]. The model performance was evaluated using four objective functions namely; coefficient of determination (R 2 ), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) and percent bias (PBIAS).…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%