2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2008
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2008.4775248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of SysML to design of ATCA based LLRF control system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the first author, who was the responsible for the design had only a reduced knowledge of UML. Although some previous knowledge of UML can be useful to overcome initial doubts in SysML, it appears from this limited experience that its presence is far from required and so we do not agree with [4] in this respect. Even with that knowledge, new challenges are presented in the form of the new SysML diagrams and elements that can be used, and of the system domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the first author, who was the responsible for the design had only a reduced knowledge of UML. Although some previous knowledge of UML can be useful to overcome initial doubts in SysML, it appears from this limited experience that its presence is far from required and so we do not agree with [4] in this respect. Even with that knowledge, new challenges are presented in the form of the new SysML diagrams and elements that can be used, and of the system domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Although it can be considered as a simple language, since its specification doesn't define any methodology and the language doesn't require one of those to be actually used, it can lead to potential problems and errors. According our experience with this case study, the use of a methodology as pointed in [4] is required. Its possible definition in the language's specification should not be ignored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations