2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2017.2738448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the 4-D XCAT Phantoms in Biomedical Imaging and Beyond

Abstract: The four dimensional (4D) eXtended CArdiac-Torso (XCAT) series of phantoms was developed to provide accurate computerized models of the human anatomy and physiology. The XCAT series encompasses a vast population of phantoms of varying ages from newborn to adult, each including parameterized models for the cardiac and respiratory motions. With great flexibility in the XCAT’s design, any number of body sizes, different anatomies, cardiac or respiratory motions or patterns, patient positions and orientations, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, currently there is not a physical phantom that is able to accurately model the variability of the human respiratory motion. The advantage of using this developed 4D CBCT digital phantom over existing phantoms such as the 4D XCAT [2] phantom is that this phantom provides actual motion of each tissue and organ independently. Unlike XCAT , although it provides detailed human anatomical features and includes an internal motion model derived from 4D CT data [14], the motion model heavily depends on a user-defined motion curve that does not simulate the motion of each organ uniquely , thus hindering its ability to simulate complex deformations due to respiration [15].…”
Section: Reconstructed Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, currently there is not a physical phantom that is able to accurately model the variability of the human respiratory motion. The advantage of using this developed 4D CBCT digital phantom over existing phantoms such as the 4D XCAT [2] phantom is that this phantom provides actual motion of each tissue and organ independently. Unlike XCAT , although it provides detailed human anatomical features and includes an internal motion model derived from 4D CT data [14], the motion model heavily depends on a user-defined motion curve that does not simulate the motion of each organ uniquely , thus hindering its ability to simulate complex deformations due to respiration [15].…”
Section: Reconstructed Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of various digital phantoms , such as the widely used 4D XCAT phantom [2] in medical imaging have greatly aided the development of new algorithms to ensure the accuracy during IGRT , thus allowing them to be simulated prior to clinical validation. However, a main challenge still remains which is to generate a digital phantom that is able to accurately emulate the internal anatomical changes of various organs due to either respiratory and/or cardiac motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the calculated average organ doses from these studies are often adapted to the patient by simple scaling methods based on for example, actual body size . The procedure is practical, but comparisons between different phantom models show large differences in organ doses despite closely matched organ and patient characteristics, which could be indicative for the uncertainties in the estimates vis‐a‐vis the actual average organ dose in the patient . Application of individualized organ dose estimates together with clinical information should be able to provide risk estimates better adapted to medical exposures through epidemiological studies in patient cohorts, conforming to or improving on the current estimates, primarily based on the atomic bomb survivors…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The procedure is practical, but comparisons between different phantom models show large differences in organ doses despite closely matched organ and patient characteristics, which could be indicative for the uncertainties in the estimates vis-a-vis the actual average organ dose in the patient. 21,22 Application of individualized organ dose estimates together with clinical information should be able to provide risk estimates better adapted to medical exposures through epidemiological studies in patient cohorts, conforming to or improving on the current estimates, primarily based on the atomic bomb survivors. 1 A valid alternative to phantom models would be to directly perform MC dose calculations 23,24 for the actual exposure and patient specific anatomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When asking questions about the capability of the design of a system, computer simulations can be extremely valuable. Complex anthropomorphic computer phantoms (such as the XCAT phantom) 4 are available to simulate time-varying activity distributions in the patient, complete with respiratory motion, cardiac contraction and myocardial defects. Coupling these with an accurate model of the camera itself, Monte Carlo simulation (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%