2017
DOI: 10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i4/2910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Bloom’s Taxonomy in Online Instructional Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, Krathwohl (2002) postulates that RBT alleviates the pressure on students in writing classes because it suggests the educators to teach writing topics from easy to the difficult format. Additionally, Ahmad and Hussin (2017) attest that teaching grammar through online games can boost students' grammar performance dramatically if games are designed according to the principles of RBT. They elucidate that questions should be asked in a balanced way rather than asking an easy and a hard question consecutively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, Krathwohl (2002) postulates that RBT alleviates the pressure on students in writing classes because it suggests the educators to teach writing topics from easy to the difficult format. Additionally, Ahmad and Hussin (2017) attest that teaching grammar through online games can boost students' grammar performance dramatically if games are designed according to the principles of RBT. They elucidate that questions should be asked in a balanced way rather than asking an easy and a hard question consecutively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the indicators created in the blueprint follow the hierarchy of cognitive and psychomotor domains. The cognitive domain is classified into six hierarchies, called remember (C1), understand (C2), apply (C3), analyze (C4), evaluate (C5), and create (C6) (Ahmad & Hussin, 2017;Nurdiana, 2018;Octoria et al, 2016;Oktaviana & Susiaty, 2020). As the same with the cognitive domain, the psychomotor domain is classified into five hierarchies, called imitation (P1), manipulation (P2), precision (P3), articulation (P4), and naturalization (P5).…”
Section: Design Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future educators can instill accountability in their deserving students and recognize that each learner is unique based on individual differences, allowing them to pinpoint his or her strengths and weaknesses in order to further improve the students. As with all taxonomies, there must be a very clear instructional intention for growth in this area specified in the learning objectives when labeling objectives use this domain (Syed Ahmad and Hussin, 2017).…”
Section: Affective Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%