2022
DOI: 10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i111396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the CERES-Rice Model for Rice Yield Gap Analysis

Abstract: Aim: This study aimed to quantify and identify the trends in the yield gaps over the 15 years (2006-07 to 2020-21) in the Karimnagar district of Telangana State in India. The DSSAT v4.7.5 CERES-Rice model was used to calculate the potential yields and then yield gaps were calculated. For the yield gaps, linear and compound growth rates were determined. Results: (Crop Environment Resource Synthesis) CERES-Rice model has simulated the potential yields with the given weather and soil data of Karimnagar dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model yielded an average district yield of 5350 kg/ha, comparable to the official statistics of 5014 kg/ha [53]. Based on the observations, it can be asserted that the model exhibits a high degree of reliability in accurately projecting crop yields over a range of different management approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The model yielded an average district yield of 5350 kg/ha, comparable to the official statistics of 5014 kg/ha [53]. Based on the observations, it can be asserted that the model exhibits a high degree of reliability in accurately projecting crop yields over a range of different management approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…From the figure it was clear that observed data points closely align with the simulated data, exhibiting a tightly clustered distribution along the line of best fit. This indicates a high degree of agreement between the observed and simulated datasets [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Model Performance Evaluation During Validationmentioning
confidence: 53%