Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly being adopted globally to address various public health issues. DHIs can be categorized according to four main types of technology: mobile based, web based, telehealth, and electronic health records. In 2006, Norman and Skinner introduced the eHealth literacy model, encompassing six domains of skills and abilities (basic, health, information, scientific, media, and computer) needed to effectively understand, process, and act on health-related information. Little is known about whether these domains are assessed or accounted for in DHIs. Objective This study aims to explore how DHIs assess and evaluate the eHealth literacy model, describe which health conditions are addressed, and which technologies are used. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the literature on DHIs, based on randomized controlled trial design and reporting the assessment of any domain of the eHealth literacy model. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. A duplicate selection and data extraction process was performed; we charted the results according to the country of origin, health condition, technology used, and eHealth literacy domain. Results We identified 131 unique DHIs conducted in 26 different countries between 2001 and 2020. Most DHIs were conducted in English-speaking countries (n=81, 61.8%), delivered via the web (n=68, 51.9%), and addressed issues related to noncommunicable diseases (n=57, 43.5%) or mental health (n=26, 19.8%). None of the interventions assessed all six domains of the eHealth literacy model. Most studies focused on the domain of health literacy (n=96, 73.2%), followed by digital (n=19, 14.5%), basic and media (n=4, 3%), and information and scientific literacy (n=1, 0.7%). Of the 131 studies, 7 (5.3%) studies covered both health and digital literacy. Conclusions Although many selected DHIs assessed health or digital literacy, no studies comprehensively evaluated all domains of the eHealth literacy model; this evidence might be overlooking important factors that can mediate or moderate the effects of these interventions. Future DHIs should comprehensively assess the eHealth literacy model while developing or evaluating interventions to understand how and why interventions can be effective.

Enrollment and Retention of Participants in Remote Digital Health Studies: Scoping Review and Framework Proposal

“…Mental tasks, such as the measure of cognitive burden of a participant, are harder to quantify as they typically rely on patient-reported outcome measures [37,38]. In digital heath studies, task complexity is compounded by electronic measurements and device handling, which may require high digital literacy skills [39][40][41]. Task complexity can be reduced by accompanying measures, such as passive data collection, or technical support.…”

Digital Health for Supporting Precision Medicine in Pediatric Endocrine Disorders: Opportunities for Improved Patient Care

“…There are concerns about the quality of mobile health apps that might contain misleading information ( 90 ), and privacy risks have been widely reported in apps in diverse therapeutic areas ( 91 – 93 ). With security risks continuously evolving, a key aspect to consider is the constant need for updating the training of clinicians, caregivers, and patients to maximize their digital health literacy skills for technologies to be used safely ( 94 , 95 ).…”

Future Problem-Solving Practiced During COVID-19: Implications for Health Management Students' E-Health Literacy Identity

“…Today, however, their role is perceived as to teach and develop new abilities among students and to prepare them for today's work market (Alt and Naamati-Schneider, 2021b ). They must be capable of solving real problems in real-time and synthesizing their existing personal knowledge while dealing ceaselessly with the challenges of the new, constantly changing world (El-Benny et al, 2021 ). The need has arisen within the framework of these abilities for a high level of literacy and extensive online medical literacy.…”