2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the FARMSCOPER tool for assessing agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation methods across the Hampshire Avon Demonstration Test Catchment, UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows at a regional scale there a substantial historical mass of nitrate Environmental managers should take into account this mass when considering the implementation of catchment mitigation measures in attempts to improve groundwater, surface water and ecological quality. These measures typically consist of changes to agricultural practices through on-farm approaches (Zhang et al, 2012) and larger-scale interventions such nitrate vulnerable zones (Johnson et al, 2007). At the national scale, assessing where there is significant vadose zone N storage would be useful in setting timescales and objectives for improvements in waterbody environmental status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows at a regional scale there a substantial historical mass of nitrate Environmental managers should take into account this mass when considering the implementation of catchment mitigation measures in attempts to improve groundwater, surface water and ecological quality. These measures typically consist of changes to agricultural practices through on-farm approaches (Zhang et al, 2012) and larger-scale interventions such nitrate vulnerable zones (Johnson et al, 2007). At the national scale, assessing where there is significant vadose zone N storage would be useful in setting timescales and objectives for improvements in waterbody environmental status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidance on the preparation of farm‐scale soil erosion risk maps, manure management plans, and nutrient budgeting provide examples of general existing DSSs available to farmers to help enact good practice, but their adoption has been voluntary. A Microsoft Excel‐based DST (FARMSCOPER, http://www.adas.uk/Service/farmscoper) has been developed in the UK to compare and prioritize mitigation measures that span the source–mobilization–delivery continuum based on an analysis of assessment of their costs and efficacy (Zhang et al, 2012; Gooday et al, 2014). …”
Section: United Kingdom and Republic Of Irelandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By simulating the phosphorus balances throughout the catchment and applying a series of management strategies, we aim to quantify the effects of alternative control measures such as P removal at WWTPs or P reductions from agricultural sources. Phosphorus budgets and mitigation measures have been investigated from a field data perspective or an export coefficient approach by many lead researchers such as Sharpley et al (1994), Jarvie et al (2002Jarvie et al ( , 2006, Johnes and Butterfield (2003), Neal and Jarvie (2005), Neal et al (2010Neal et al ( , 2006 and Zhang et al (2012), but in this study we utilise a process based dynamic model, which allows a more complete mass balance and an assessment of the dynamic interactions within the catchment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%