Application of the Flynn Effect for the Bayley III Scales

Robertson, Charlene M.T.; Hendson, Leonora; Biggs, Wayne S.G.; Acton, Bryan

doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.199

Cited by 12 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Meanwhile, preterm Taiwanese infants' cognitive and motor performance approached the Bayley-III norms, and their rates of developmental delay were lower than the previously established prevalence estimates (cognitive delay 0-1% vs. 4-30%, language delay 2-9% vs. 8-26%, and motor delay 0-1% vs. 4-11%) (Amin, Prinzing, & Myers, 2009;Jackson, Needelman, Roberts, Willet, & McMorris, 2012;Kaaresen et al, 2008;Maguire et al, 2009aMaguire et al, , 2009bMossabeb, Wade, Finnegan, Sivieri, & Abbasi, 2012;Mukhopadhyay, Malhi, Mahajan, & Narang, 2010;Peters et al, 2009). The finding concerning the underestimation of the rate of developmental delay by the Bayley-III has also been documented in recent studies of term and preterm infants in Western countries (Acton et al, 2011;Anderson et al, 2010;Esteban et al, 2010;Makrides et al, 2010;Moore et al, 2012;Reuner et al, 2013;Robertson et al, 2010;Spittle et al, 2010;Vohr et al, 2012). This result might be attributed to the changes in the demographic characteristics of the American population from 1988 to 2000 and the composition of 10% of the clinical populations in the new normative sample (Bayley, 2006).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 54%

“…However, recent cross-cultural studies indicated that the Bayley-III tends to overestimate the performance of children with typical development or at risk for developmental disorder (i.e., prematurity, autism, and heart disease) in Australia Makrides et al, 2010;Spittle et al, 2010), Canada (Acton et al, 2011;Robertson, Hendson, Biggs, & Acton, 2010), Germany (Reuner, Fields, Wittke, Lopprich, & Pietz, 2013), Spain (Esteban et al, 2010), and United Kingdom (Moore, Johnson, Haider, Hennessy, & Marlow, 2012). Furthermore, the concurrent administration of the two editions on the same children showed that the Bayley-III composite scores were higher than the BSID-II index scores, with larger differences in the cognitive and motor scales than in the language scale (Acton et al, 2011;Lowe, Erickson, Schrader, & Duncan, 2012;Moore et al, 2012;Reuner et al, 2013;Robertson et al, 2010). These Bayley-III studies were predominantly conducted using a cross-sectional design with children at a specific age or within a small age range in Western countries.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants

Hsieh

Hsu

et al. 2013

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 54%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants

Hsieh

Hsu

et al. 2013

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In addition, the validity of previously published articles that addressed developmental outcomes for extremely preterm children using the Bayley II was questioned (12). The unanswered question remains: how much of this controversy is due to the different versions of the test (13) and what strategies can be used in current research to allow comparison of scores obtained using both editions of the Bayley Scales so as to allow interpretation of extensive data collected using the Bayley II?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III cognitive scale: are we measuring the same thing?

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To better understand differences between Bayley Scales 3rd edition (Bayley III) Cognitive Scale and Bayley Scales 2nd edition (Bayley II) Mental Developmental Index (MDI) in 18–22 month old children born term and preterm; and to create a conversion algorithm using Bayley II MDI to calculate Bayley III Cognitive score. Methods This study included 51 term and 26 preterm children between 18 and 22 months, ages adjusted for prematurity. Children’s scores on Bayley II MDI and Bayley III Cognitive Scale were compared using t-tests. The items from Bayley II MDI were used to calculate a score for the Bayley III Cognitive Scale. ANCOVA was used to create a conversion scale. Results Bayley III Cognitive scores were significantly higher than Bayley II MDI scores for term and preterm toddlers combined and separately (p<.0001). A conversion formula to convert Bayley II MDI to a Bayley III Cognitive score was calculated. Conclusion Term and preterm children had similarly elevated scores on the Bayley III calculated Cognitive score compared to the previous Bayley II MDI score. The use of a conversion algorithm maybe helpful in studies that used both Bayley editions in order to get comparable outcome measurements within a clinical or research paradigm.

show abstract

“…However, this characteristic was not observed in other studies conducted with the Bayley III Scale 13 16 , 18 , 21 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 Because of that, it was necessary to conduct a 7-point correction of the scores in the Bayley III Scale.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Validade Concorrente Da Escala Brunet-Lézine Com a Escala Bayley Para Avaliação Do Desenvolvimento De Bebês Pré-Termo Até Dois Anos

Cardoso

Formiga

Bizinotto

et al. 2017

Rev. paul. pediatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To verify the correlation between the areas evaluated by the Brunet-Lézine and the Bayley III scales of preterm infants up to two years. Methods: The study included 88 children who were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (1 month to 5 months and 29 days of corrected chronological ages - CCA) with 32 children; Group 2 (6 months to 11 months and 29 days of CCA) with 36 participants; and Group 3 (18 -23 months and 23 days of CCA) with 20 children. The concurrent validity of the Brunet-Lézine scale and the Bayley III scale was calculated using the Pearson correlation or its non-parametric version, the Spearman correlation. Results: Group 1 showed moderate correlation between the developmental quotient for hand-eye and fine motor coordination (DQE), and fine motor score (ρ=0.448; p=0.01). Group 2 had moderate correlation between the developmental quotient for posture and gross motor function (DQP), and the gross motor score (ρ=0.484; p=0.003, between the DQE and fine motor score (r=0.489; p=0.002), and between the developmental quotient for social reactions (DQS) and the socio emotional score (r=0.435; p=0.008). Group 3 showed moderate correlation between the DQP and the gross motor score (ρ=0.468; p=0.037) and strong correlation between developmental quotient for language (DQL) and the score of language (r=0.890; p<0.001). Conclusions: The Brunet-Lézine scale showed strong correlation with the Bayley III scale regarding the language domain in Group 3, suggesting its validity to assess the language of children aged between 18 and 24 months.

show abstract

Application of the Flynn Effect for the Bayley III Scales

Cited by 12 publications

References 4 publications

A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants

A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants

Comparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III cognitive scale: are we measuring the same thing?

Validade Concorrente Da Escala Brunet-Lézine Com a Escala Bayley Para Avaliação Do Desenvolvimento De Bebês Pré-Termo Até Dois Anos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About