1979
DOI: 10.1016/0364-5916(79)90013-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Kaufman approach to the calculation of intra-rare earth phase diagrams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gschneidner and Calderwood phase diagram considers Pr-Nd alloys to behave as ideal solutions, and therefore represents phase transformations by straight lines rather than showing two-phase fields. This representation is consistent with the general principle that alloys of trivalent rare-earth elements with atomic numbers that differ by less than ~±4 behave as ideal solutions at high temperatures [10], with experimental data from Lundin and colleagues [362,366], and with a phase diagram calculated by Shiflet et al [367]. However, it is not consistent with the phase diagram of Markova et al, which shows two-phase fields involving temperature differences of up to ~100 °C.…”
Section: Phase Diagramssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gschneidner and Calderwood phase diagram considers Pr-Nd alloys to behave as ideal solutions, and therefore represents phase transformations by straight lines rather than showing two-phase fields. This representation is consistent with the general principle that alloys of trivalent rare-earth elements with atomic numbers that differ by less than ~±4 behave as ideal solutions at high temperatures [10], with experimental data from Lundin and colleagues [362,366], and with a phase diagram calculated by Shiflet et al [367]. However, it is not consistent with the phase diagram of Markova et al, which shows two-phase fields involving temperature differences of up to ~100 °C.…”
Section: Phase Diagramssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, it is not consistent with the phase diagram of Markova et al, which shows two-phase fields involving temperature differences of up to ~100 °C. It seems likely that the range of temperatures included in a possible two-phase fields are highly dependent on the impurity content of the individual samples used to construct the phase diagram [363,367].…”
Section: Phase Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9,15). It should be noted that, in contrast to the present case, the Kaufman method is typically used to calculate phase diagrams via free energy data generated from purely theoretical interaction parameters (9,16). Furthermore, most of the binary systems to which Kaufman has applied this approach involve elements in the group numbers 4-10, with particular emphasis having been placed upon refractory metal systems.…”
Section: Free Energy Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%