Application of the multi-criteria decision method ELECTRE III for the Weapon selection

Ashari, Hamid Esna; Parsaei, Masoud

doi:10.5267/j.dsl.2014.6.001

Cited by 16 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To understand the operator binary relationship and compare alternatives a and b, we apply the following: Source: Adapted from (Vallée and Zielniewicz, 1994), (Giannoulis and Ishizaka, 2010), (Ashari and Parsaei, 2014), (Infante et al, 2014), JM2 14,1 P is the strict preference relationship, aPb, denoting a relationship showing that "a is strongly preferable compared to b". I is the indifference relationship, where aIb denotes a relationship showing that "a is indifferent to b".…”

Section: Description Of the Electre III Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Classifying the integrated public safety areas (IPSAs): a multi-criteria based approach

Basílio

Pereira

Costa

2019

JM2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to focus on the application of a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method to compare results presented by the Integrated Goals System based on the 12th edition of the Integrated Public Safety Areas (IPSAs) Award, which achieved goals established for Strategic Crime Indicators for the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The main objective of this research was to limit the compensatory effects of classification criteria on IPSAs that have achieved goals established for crime indicators by applying the MCDA method. Design/methodology/approach The methodology was based on the application of MCDA. The MCDA method selected and used was ELECTRE III, being implemented by J-Electre software. Findings Compared to results of the current method, the results of the ELECTRE III method showed a 94.87 per cent change in ranking positions revealed via the SIM method. This finding denotes the elimination of compensatory effects of the criteria. As a consequence, it can be affirmed that the application of resources by IPSA managers to reduce the prevalence of a single strategic crime indicator is no longer a success factor for awarding in the established goal system. Research limitations/implications As limitations, it is possible to indicate the time cut used to carry out the research. The research may be extended to other issues of the productivity award. Practical implications The methodology applied with the use of ELECTRE III revealed that the government could reduce the cost with the incentive program to reduce criminal indices. Social implications As the MCDA method is based on a binary pairwise comparison system, the methodology imposes a change of attitude on local managers fighting crime to reduce crime indicators and to consequently build a local sense of safety in IPSAs. Originality/value This research fills a gap in the literature because there are few studies using the MCDA method in the field of public security. The value of the work lies in the creation of a method that gives the decision-maker, of the law enforcement agency, an alternative to improve the process of rewarding by productividad of the integrated areas of public security.

show abstract

Section: Description Of the Electre III Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To determine the concordance index, it is necessary to establish the level of credibility from a criterion (Bernabeu, 1980;Ashari and Parsaei, 2014) called the partial concordance index c j , which is defined by the following general formula:…”

Section: Description Of the Electre III Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Classifying the integrated public safety areas (IPSAs): a multi-criteria based approach

Basílio

Pereira

Costa

2019

JM2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…O método ELECTRE III desenvolvido por (Roy, 1978) e aplicado recentemente por (Lopez; Noriega; Chavira, 2017), (Leoneti, 2016), e (Hodgett, 2016) Em relação a 1ª. Etapa, este estudo utilizará as notações aplicadas por (Bernabeu, 1980), (Roy;Bouyssou, 1993) , (Montazer;Saremi;Ramezani, 2009), (Ashari;Parsaei, 2014): Após a construção dos índices de concordância e discordância, inicia-se a elaboração da matriz dos índices de credibilidade ou grau de sobreclassificação como denominado por (Infante;Mendonça;Valle, 2014). Contudo, como assevera (Roy;Bouyssou, 1993)  A λ_qualificação de a em D, com a notação , que é a quantidade:…”

Section: Descrição Do Método Electre IIIunclassified

Análise Do Processo De Premiação Das Áreas Integradas De Segurança No Rio De Janeiro: Uma Abordagem Multicritério

Basílio¹,

Pereira²

2017

Anais Do Encontro Nacional De Engenharia De Produção

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O presente estudo aplicou um multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) para obtenção do ranking das Áreas Intergradas de Segurança Pública (AISP), para fins de premiação pelo Sistema Integrado de Metas (SIM). A aplicação de um MCDA teve o objetivo de eliminar o efeito compensatório dos critérios, evitando que o sucesso em um critério compensasse o fracasso em outro. O método escolhido foi ELECTRE III (ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité), pois o problema em análise adequava-se ao tipo (P.γ). Quantos aos fins, a metodologia pode ser classificada como metodológica e aplicada e quanto aos meios bibliográfica, documental e de laboratório. Os dados foram obtidos em colaboração com a Polícia Militar do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, em janeiro de 2017, referindo-se a 12ª edição de premiação do SIM, ocorrida no primeiro semestre de 2015. A escolha desta edição deu-se pelo fato de ser a única em que onze AISPs empataram em primeiro lugar. Para efeitos de geração das matrizes de concordância, discordância, credibilidade, ranking parcial e final, foi utilizado o software J-Electre. Como resultado da aplicação do método ELECTRE III, obteve-se um ranking sem empate entre as três primeiras colocações. A eliminação do efeito compensatório pode ser percebida comparando-se os resultados obtidos pelo SIM versus o ELECTRE III, onde a ordem de classificação das unidades foi alterada. Como contribuição pode-se afirma que para o caso estudo resultaria em uma economia, pois deixariam de serem premiadas oito AISPs.

show abstract

“…Referensi [2], meneliti tentang peringkat universitas di Inggris, dalam penelitiannya mengatakan bahwa Electre III dengan pseudokriteria sesuai untuk masalah yang diteliti. Kemudian Referensi [1] dalam penelitian tentang pemilihan senjata menggunakan metode Electre III dan Simos. Kriteria yang digunakan adalah kriteria berat, tingkat presisi untuk membidik target, potensi untuk pemotretan konstan, potensi yang diterapkan di berbagai kondisi iklim, dan harga.…”

Section: B Tinjauan Pustaka 1 Penelitian Terdahuluunclassified

Pemodelan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Kenaikan Biaya Kuliah Pada Program Studi Menggunakan Metode Entropy-Electre III dan Analisis Trend Kuadrat Terkecil

Zaidir¹

2017

jtir

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTISARIPemodelan tidak terlepas dari proses analisis dan desain sistem, terutama untuk menghasilkan sistem informasi untuk pengambilan keputusan. Pengambilan keputusan, sesuatu hal yang dilakukan secara terus menerus pada manajemen dengan melakukan pemilihan alternatif tindakan untuk mencapai tujuan dan sasaran. Paradigma dalam melakukan pengambilan keputusan sudah bergeser dengan pengolahan data berbasis komputer seiring bertambahnya data dan tingginya kebutuhan informasi. Terkait penentuan besaran biaya kuliah, masih ada perguruan tinggi yang melakukan secara konvensional. Kenaikan biaya kuliah mempertimbangkan banyak aspek yaitu pengembangan institusi, peningkatan kualitas pendidikan, dan lain-lain. Pertimbangan tersebut bersifat subjektif, dan penentuan kenaikan biaya kuliah belum berdasarkan aturan khusus. Penetapan biaya kuliah memerlukan pendekatan sistematis, karena masalah ini cukup kompleks dan penting. Penelitian ini bertujuan menghasilkan model sistem pendukung keputusan untuk menentukan prioritas program studi dalam menaikkan biaya kuliah dan memberikan estimasi besaran biaya masing-masing komponen biaya kuliah. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini dimulai dari studi pustaka, pengumpulan data, dan pengembangan model yang terdiri atas penentuan alternatif dan kriteria, perancangan dan pengujian model.Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebuah model sistem pendukung keputusan untuk menentukan prioritas program studi yang direkomendasikan menaikkan biaya kuliah. Untuk memodelkan sistem pendukung keputusan dalm menentukan prioritas Prodi (PS) yang direkomendasikan untuk menaikkan biaya kuliah menggunakan metode ELECTRE III diperlukan alternatif dalam bentuk prodi dan kriteria untuk menilai kelayakan dari berbagai aspek. Untuk menentukan estimasi kenaikan biaya kuliah menggunakan metode analisis trend dengan kuadrat terkecil diperlukan data-data historis dalam bentuk biaya kuliah yang sudah diterapkan selama ini.Kata Kunci: Pemodelan, ELECTRE III, Entropy, Analisis TrendABSTRACTModeling can not be separated from the process of analysis and system design, especially to produce information systems for decision making. Decision-making, something that is done continuously on management by choosing alternative actions to achieve goals and objectives. Paradigm in making decision has shifted with computer-based data processing along with increasing data and high information needs. Related to the determination of the tuition fee, there are still universities that perform conventionally. The increase in tuition fees takes into account many aspects of institutional development, improving the quality of education, and so on. The considerations are subjective, and the determination of the tuition increase is not yet subject to special rules. Setting up tuition requires a systematic approach, because the problem is complex and important.This study aims to produce a model decision support system to determine the priority of the study program in raising tuition fees and provide an estimate of the cost of each component of the tuition fee. The method used in this study started from literature study, data collection, and model development consisting of determining alternatives and criteria, design and model testing.The result of this research is a model of decision support system to determine the priority of the recommended study program to increase the tuition fee. To model the decision support system in prioritizing the recommended Prodi (PS) to raise the tuition fees using the ELECTRE III method, alternatives are needed in the form of study programs and criteria for assessing the feasibility of various aspects. To determine the estimated increase in tuition fees using the trend analysis method with the least squares required historical data in the form of tuition fees that have been applied so far.Keyword: Modeling, ELECTRE III, Entropy, Analisis Trend

show abstract

Application of the multi-criteria decision method ELECTRE III for the Weapon selection

Cited by 16 publications

References 32 publications

Classifying the integrated public safety areas (IPSAs): a multi-criteria based approach

Classifying the integrated public safety areas (IPSAs): a multi-criteria based approach

Análise Do Processo De Premiação Das Áreas Integradas De Segurança No Rio De Janeiro: Uma Abordagem Multicritério

Pemodelan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Kenaikan Biaya Kuliah Pada Program Studi Menggunakan Metode Entropy-Electre III dan Analisis Trend Kuadrat Terkecil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About