1991
DOI: 10.1016/0164-0704(91)90036-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the RESET test to the original Andersen-Jordan equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ljung-Box Q-statistic test examines the null hypothesis of no autocorrelation up to the 8th order. The regression specification error test (RESET) equation includes the squared fitted series; similar results emerge when the RESET equation includes a quadratic time trend (as proposed by Baghestani, 1991)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The Ljung-Box Q-statistic test examines the null hypothesis of no autocorrelation up to the 8th order. The regression specification error test (RESET) equation includes the squared fitted series; similar results emerge when the RESET equation includes a quadratic time trend (as proposed by Baghestani, 1991)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The RESET test by Ramsey (1969) is a convenient device for testing general misspecification (e.g., Vitaliano 1987;Baghestani 1991;Peters 2000, among others), but is known not to be robust to autocorrelated disturbances, especially when the regressor is itself highly autocorrelated (Porter and Kashyap 1984) or contains a deterministic time trend (Leung and Yu 2001). Using simulation, Porter and Kashyap showed that the presence of serially correlated disturbances combined with an AR(1) regressor leads to size distortions, and the more autocorrelated the regressor is, the less robust the RESET test is to error autocorrelation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%