2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-008-0320-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the response surface methods to solve inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions

Abstract: The inverse first-order reliability method (FORM) is considered to be one of the most widely used methods in inverse reliability analysis. It has been recognized that there are shortcomings of the inverse FORM in solving inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions, primarily inefficiency and difficulties involved in evaluating derivatives of the implicit response functions with respect to random variables. In order to apply the inverse FORM to structural inverse reliability analysis, response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response surface technology is to use a hyper surface to approximately substitute the relationship between the input and output of the actual complicated structure [5], [6]. The specific steps of method in this paper:…”
Section: B Calculation Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response surface technology is to use a hyper surface to approximately substitute the relationship between the input and output of the actual complicated structure [5], [6]. The specific steps of method in this paper:…”
Section: B Calculation Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the computational efficiency with the acceptable accuracy, the surrogate model method (also known as the response surface method (RSM)) was developed for probabilistic analysis. Cheng and Li [16] employed RSM to solve the inverse structural reliability problems with implicit functions. Allaix and Carbone [17] used an improved RSM to evaluate structural reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximations differ significantly for various numbers of sample points and their locations [18]. Scholars have attempted different sampling approaches for RSM, of which the well-known ones are Bucher experimental design, central composite design [19], full factorial design [20], uniform design [21], gradient projection method, and the continuous linear interpolation of high-precision RSM [22]. Either the gradient projection method or continuous linear interpolation can be employed to select the sampling point on the limit state equation.…”
Section: Advances In Mechanical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%