2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the smoothed point interpolation methods in computational geomechanics: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ε𝑘 is the constant smoothed strain over the 𝑘th partial nodal smoothing domain, 𝐴 𝑆𝐷 𝑘 is the area of the 𝑘th partial nodal smoothing domain, Γ SD 𝑘 is the boundary of the 𝑘th partial smoothing domain, and 𝑳 𝑛 is the matrix of unit outward normal vector defined in Equation ( 8) with 𝑛 1 and 𝑛 2 being the unit outward vector normal to the boundary of the partial smoothing domain at each point of interest. From Equation (22), the smoothed strain for the 𝑘th partial smoothing domain can be obtained as,…”
Section: Construction Of the Stiffness And Permeability Matrices In P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ε𝑘 is the constant smoothed strain over the 𝑘th partial nodal smoothing domain, 𝐴 𝑆𝐷 𝑘 is the area of the 𝑘th partial nodal smoothing domain, Γ SD 𝑘 is the boundary of the 𝑘th partial smoothing domain, and 𝑳 𝑛 is the matrix of unit outward normal vector defined in Equation ( 8) with 𝑛 1 and 𝑛 2 being the unit outward vector normal to the boundary of the partial smoothing domain at each point of interest. From Equation (22), the smoothed strain for the 𝑘th partial smoothing domain can be obtained as,…”
Section: Construction Of the Stiffness And Permeability Matrices In P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material nonlinearity in the governing equations is tackled by adopting a modified Newton-Raphson iterative process. The overall framework of this numerical scheme has been detailed in the previous publications by the authors (e.g., 2,[17][18][19][20][21][22] ) and elsewhere (e.g., 23 ), hence it is not reproduced here for the brevity. In the following section, we only focus on those aspects of the formulation that are new to the proposed PNS-FEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, only several scholars used SPIMs to investigate the deformation behavior of geological bodies. For example, Khoshghalb conducted a comparative study of the coupled problems of geomechanics based on cell-based SPIM, node-based SPIM, and edge-based SPIM (Khoshghalb et al ., 2020). Khoshghalb and Tootoonchi investigated the deformation characteristics of saturated porous media using node-based SPIM (Khoshghalb and Shafee, 2021) and cell-based SPIM (Tootoonchi et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, soil liquefaction resistance is affected by factors, such as soil type, fine content, grain characteristics, degree of saturation, relative density (void ratio), confining stress, cyclic loading frequency, and earthquake magnitude [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Recently, the soil liquefaction and the interaction between soil skeletion and pore fluid have been evaluated by using numerical modelling [15][16][17][18][19][20]. The liquefaction resistance is often accessed in terms of the cyclic stress ratio (CSR), which is the ratio of cyclic shear stress (c) to the effective consolidation pressure (c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%