2016
DOI: 10.1111/camh.12190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Added Value Score in evaluating the effectiveness of Functional Family Therapy within local authority social work services

Abstract: Background: As 'Blueprints' evidence-based programmes, such as Functional Family Therapy (FFT), originating from the United States, are increasingly implemented in Social Work services, the importance of assessing their effectiveness in a UK context is crucial. To do this, it is not always practical for services to commission randomised control trials or quasi-experimental control trials. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Added Value Score has been shown to have utility in the evaluation of in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
4
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(37 reference statements)
3
4
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Parent‐reports of the SDQ total score demonstrated a moderate effect size, with externalizing, internalizing, and emotional and conduct problems approaching or at a moderate effect size. This is generally in line with the effect sizes of parent‐reported disruptive behavior problems found in other international studies of FFT ( d = 0.53–0.68; Hartnett et al, ; Marshall et al, ). Adolescent‐reported outcomes of the SDQ found small effect sizes for internalizing and externalizing difficulties, emotional and conduct problems, and total difficulty scores, which is comparable to effect sizes found in Hartnett et al ( d = 0.37; 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Parent‐reports of the SDQ total score demonstrated a moderate effect size, with externalizing, internalizing, and emotional and conduct problems approaching or at a moderate effect size. This is generally in line with the effect sizes of parent‐reported disruptive behavior problems found in other international studies of FFT ( d = 0.53–0.68; Hartnett et al, ; Marshall et al, ). Adolescent‐reported outcomes of the SDQ found small effect sizes for internalizing and externalizing difficulties, emotional and conduct problems, and total difficulty scores, which is comparable to effect sizes found in Hartnett et al ( d = 0.37; 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, parents generally reported larger and more significant changes than adolescents. This difference reflects earlier findings on evaluations with the SDQ (Marshall, et al, ). The variation could be due to parents ‘and adolescents’ experience of problems in differing contexts (De Los Reyes et al, ), but it could also reflect adolescents’ reluctance to report issues concerning themselves (Marshall et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations