2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to probabilistic site characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, 2000 N s total samples were generated in the enhanced TMCMC simulation. According to previous results, the total number of stages for different model class selections was not always the same.…”
Section: Selection Of Sand Modelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, 2000 N s total samples were generated in the enhanced TMCMC simulation. According to previous results, the total number of stages for different model class selections was not always the same.…”
Section: Selection Of Sand Modelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Consequently, p(θ) 0 equals the prior distribution p(θ) for j = 0, and p(θ) m is the posterior distribution p(θ|D) for j = m. The details of the original TMCMC method, with its MATLAB code, can be found in Ching and Wang. 67 In the original TMCMC, the new samples are generated from a normal distribution with the mean and standard error calculated from the samples of last iteration. However, some observations have indicated that the inappropriate mean value and standard deviation error can result in the estimated posteriors tending to fall into local convergence.…”
Section: Enhancement Of Tmcmc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some examples include the Annealed Importance Sampling [5], the Adaptive Metropolis-Hastings method [6], and the Iterated Batch Importance Sampling Algorithm [7], etc. Among them, [8] proposed the Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (TMCMC) method with applications on Bayesian inference of structural dynamics problems, as well as other engineering applications [9]. The fundamental concept of TMCMC is to sequentially update samples drawn from prior distribution (usually easy to sample from) to the posterior distribution in the Bayesian framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that ground motion prediction always associates significant uncertainty, Bayesian learning framework (Bishop, ; Beck, ) is introduced in the study to provide a rigorous solution for uncertainty quantification for both parametric level (learning within a model class;) (Papadimitriou and Papadimitriou, ; Sun et al., ; Yuen and Kuok, ) and model class level (learning with a set of model classes;) (Adeli and Panakkat, ; Ching and Wang, ; Cheung and Beck, ; Huang et al., ; Kuok et al., ; Yuen and Mu, ). The framework has been developed and applied to different areas such as earthquake engineering (Zhou and Adeli, ; Sirca and Adeli, ; Panakkat and Adeli, , ), instrument defect detection (Castillo et al., ; Wang et al., ; Yin et al., ), structural dynamics (Ching et al., ; Lam et al., ; Lei et al., ; Lei et al., ; Sun and Betti, ), structural identification, and health monitoring (Jiang et al., ; Simoen et al., ; Spackova and Straub, ; Yuen and Katafygiotis, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%