Application of The UV-Irradiated Homologous and Heterologous Sperm for Activa Tion of the Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Eggs and Production of the Gynogenetic Stocks

Abstract

meiotic gynogenetic development of the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, walbaum 1792) was induced in the course of egg activation performed by the UV-irradiated homologous and heterologous (european grayling Thymallus thymallus linnaeus, 1758) spermatozoa. to recover diploidy in the gynogenetic zygotes, activated eggs were subjected to the high pressure shock in order to inhibit extrusion of the second polar body. gynogenetic rainbow trout progeny hatched from the eggs activated by the irradiated rainbow trout and grayling milt with similar hatching rates of 28.19% and 29.22%, respectively. however, gynogenetic rainbow trout produced with grayling semen had shown lower survival than gynogenotes provided with the homologous spermatozoa during two years of rearing. Viable hybrids are not produced between rainbow trout and grayling which ensured that fish obtained in this experiment were true gynogenetic progenies. A Robertsonian polymorphism characteristic for the rainbow trout from the studied strain was also observed among the gynogenetic specimens that exhibited diploid chromosome number ranging from 58 to 62 and stable chromosome arm number (fn= 104). no radiation-induced fragments of the paternal chromosomes were observed in the gynogenetic individuals. fish produced in both experimental variants were genotypic (XX) and phenotypic (gonads) females. The results confirmed that the gynogenetic protocol used in the present research is an efficient means of producing all-female gynogenetic rainbow trout stocks.

Induction of meiotic gynogenesis in bagrid catfish (Pseudobagrus ussuriensis) with homologous sperm and its confirmation for female homogamety

“…In most gynogenesis studies, both homologous and heterologous sperms were used to activate egg development (Adam Luckenbach et al, 2004;Dobosz et al, 2015;Meng et al, 2016). The two strategies both have advantages and disadvantages in the gynogenetic studies.…”