2010
DOI: 10.4296/cwrj3502187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Versatile Soil Moisture Budget Model to Estimate Evaporation from Prairie Grassland

Abstract: Coupled hydrological modelling of land surface and groundwater is an effective tool for water resources management. The Versatile Soil Moisture Budget (VSMB) model is a simple landsurface model that has been widely used in the Canadian prairies to simulate soil moisture conditions of cropland. Its algorithm is suitable for coupling with a groundwater model, but VSMB has not been rigorously tested for grassland as such. The accuracy of simulated grassland evaporation was evaluated against three years of field d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daily evapotranspiration was then calculated using the adjusted mean daytime latent heat flux. Comparison with daily ET estimates for the WNC site derived using the methodology of Hayashi et al (2010) suggest that our ET estimates probably represent the high end of the expected range. Hayashi et al (2010) used three methods for estimating daily ET.…”
Section: Validation: Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Daily evapotranspiration was then calculated using the adjusted mean daytime latent heat flux. Comparison with daily ET estimates for the WNC site derived using the methodology of Hayashi et al (2010) suggest that our ET estimates probably represent the high end of the expected range. Hayashi et al (2010) used three methods for estimating daily ET.…”
Section: Validation: Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Comparison with daily ET estimates for the WNC site derived using the methodology of Hayashi et al (2010) suggest that our ET estimates probably represent the high end of the expected range. Hayashi et al (2010) used three methods for estimating daily ET. The first estimate (deemed to be the lower bound) was calculated without forcing energy closure (i.e., unadjusted latent heat flux).…”
Section: Validation: Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only rarely has the error originating from the post-closure method been reported in the literature. Hayashi et al (2010) used the arithmetic average of raw flux and Bowen ratio-adjusted fluxes as a measure of uncertainty. Falge et al (2005) as well as Spank et al (2013) plotted the difference between LE-adjusted and non-adjusted flux data as a grey band to indicate the postclosure method error of the latent heat flux measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%