2023
DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2023.025499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of U-Net and Optimized Clustering in Medical Image Segmentation: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recognition results of the test set are shown in Table 3. In addition, binary descriptor-based SURF [25][26][27] and U-net technique [28,29] are being widely deployed for recognition systems. For comparison, the results identified by these two methods are also included in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition results of the test set are shown in Table 3. In addition, binary descriptor-based SURF [25][26][27] and U-net technique [28,29] are being widely deployed for recognition systems. For comparison, the results identified by these two methods are also included in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors claim 3D U-Net, Adversial U-Net, and Attention U-Bet as the main variants. In the research [15], the authors point out 2.5D U-Net, 3D U-Net, Context Nested U-Net, all connection U-Net, RU-Net, and VGG16 U-Net as the main variants. They review performances and features in the context of segmentation disadvantages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reviews have been published on automatic segmentation methods for specific regions of interest [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], image modalities [17,20,24,27,28], and methods [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. How-ever, none of these thoroughly cover all three aspects to provide a holistic overview of the state of the field.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%