2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-0840-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of ultrasound multimodal score in the assessment of endometrial receptivity in patients with artificial abortion

Abstract: Background: This study aimed to evaluate the value and feasibility of ultrasound multimodal score in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity in patients with artificial abortion (AA). Methods: Sixty-eight patients with AA (AA group) and 70 women of the childbearing age without any history of abortion (control group) were recruited between January 2018 and December 2018. All subjects received the examination of endometrium in the middle luteum phase (7-9 days after ovulation) with two-dimensional grayscale ul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second, proposed in 1998 ( 21 ), measured ER on Day 22 of the natural menstrual cycle before IVF. With advances in 3D technology, two articles published after 2020 ( 24 ) focused on the situation of the endometrium and its blood supply and omitted the observation of uterine artery and myometrial conditions. However, a paper published in 2002 ( 22 ) showed that the ultrasound scoring system was of limited value and could not better indicate the ER situation, which may be because the measurement in this article was performed on the HCG injection day and included many additional endometrial indicators, such as the myometrium echo, myometrium blood supply and uterine artery blood flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second, proposed in 1998 ( 21 ), measured ER on Day 22 of the natural menstrual cycle before IVF. With advances in 3D technology, two articles published after 2020 ( 24 ) focused on the situation of the endometrium and its blood supply and omitted the observation of uterine artery and myometrial conditions. However, a paper published in 2002 ( 22 ) showed that the ultrasound scoring system was of limited value and could not better indicate the ER situation, which may be because the measurement in this article was performed on the HCG injection day and included many additional endometrial indicators, such as the myometrium echo, myometrium blood supply and uterine artery blood flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second, proposed in 1998 (21), measured ER on Day 22 of the natural menstrual cycle before IVF. With advances in 3D technology, two articles published after 2020 (24) focused on the situation of the endometrium and its The performance of the endometrial receptivity scoring system in the verification sample. (A) Clinical pregnancy rate associated with each total endometrial receptivity score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Endometrial receptivity is closely related to pregnancy outcomes 21 . The commonly used indicators for judging endometrial receptivity include endometrial volume, endometrial thickness, and endometrial blood flow 22 . In our study, we found that STP caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate, but no correlation was found between endometrial thickness and clinical pregnancy rate in multiple regression analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study conducted by Kader et al 14 compared patients' previous cycles triggered by hCG to the current cycle. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes of the pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%